Why Cases Fail to Settle

Civil Negotiation and Mediation by Nancy Hudgins

In a litigated case, there are at least four points of view about settlement: the points of view of the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s lawyer, the defendant and the defendant’s lawyer. Add in claims representatives, boards of directors and additional parties and negotiations become more complex as more points of view are added to the mix. It’s a wonder any case settles!

I’ve been thinking about what makes litigated cases difficult to settle at mediation and I’ve come up with the five most recurring causes. While I put the burden on the lawyers in the summaries below, clients need to be prepared also.

1. Lack of preparation.

I’m almost embarrassed at the frequency with which one side or the other hasn’t taken the necessary steps to marshal facts, damages, expert’s opinions and law to be able to realistically evaluate a case’s settlement range prior to the mediation. Lack of preparation is a surefire way to reach impasse.

2. Unrealistic expectations.

(See 1 above.) Many times these are a result of lack of preparation, but not always. You can sharpen your evaluative skills by doing jury verdict research, surveying colleagues, running the facts by friends and zeroing in on the actual, quantifiable damages that you will be putting into evidence or negating. Plaintiff’s lawyers, you’ll want to make sure that your clients aren’t expecting to go to medical school as a result of a minor fender bender. Make sure unrelated goals are not tied to settlement results. Defense lawyers, get real. A clear liability case is not going to settle for one times specials.

3. Inflexibility.

When new facts are uncovered at the mediation, evaluations need to be updated. Huddle with your team and consider the new reality.

4. Win-Lose mentality.

It’s a rare case which is so one-sided that a party can say, “I’m right, you’re wrong” and refuse to negotiate. (See 5 below.) If your client can’t stand the thought of giving the other side money, give it to someone else—the other side’s favorite charity for instance. Be creative. Think of ways to increase value without necessarily increasing the settlement amount.

5. Ego.

I’ve met some plaintiffs’ lawyers who say, “I only take big cases.” I’ve known insurance companies who would rather try a case than pay to settle. My advice to both: Be realistic and evaluate each case on its own merits. Not every case is a big case. Not every case should be tried. (That said, not every case should settle; but that’s the topic of a different post.)

I’d be interested in your experience as to why cases fail to settle.

                        author

Nancy Hudgins

Nancy Hudgins, a San Francisco mediator and lawyer, began specializing in civil litigation in the 1970's. She has represented both plaintiffs and defendants, chiefly in personal injury, medical malpractice, elder abuse and product liability lawsuits, but also in a wide variety of complex litigation, including civil rights, fraud and class… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Threat to Mediation Confidentiality in California – Your Help Needed!

Dear Friend of Mediation, If you appreciate our mediation confidentiality laws or my work on them, then I ask a quick favor. Please take 15 minutes. Read my letter below....

By Ron Kelly - Arbitrator, Mediator, Trainer
Category

The Subtlety of Actual Mediations

PGP Mediation Blog by Phyllis G. Pollack Most folks think that the purpose of mediation is to settle cases. However, in the last few weeks, I have conducted some actual...

By Phyllis Pollack
Category

Maximizing Mediation – An Experienced Mediator’s Favorite Techniques

In this course, experienced mediator Jim Melamed shares his favorite techniques and strategies to help participants through the mediation process. This includes presentation of concepts associated with “Maximizing Mediation,” Framing,...

By James Melamed, J.D.

Find a Mediator

X
X
X