Whole System Change: The Future Search Conference

From John Folk-Williams’s blog Cross Collaborate

Search Curve

The Future Search Conference is one of several collaborative planning methods that take a “whole system” approach. These processes try to replace shelf-bound plans with agendas for action that are developed collaboratively in the course of intensive large-group meetings.

Key Concepts

To do this, Future Search insists on the basic starting principle: “Get the whole system in the room.” That means including everyone needed to make change happen – decision-makers from all the groups involved, internal staff and external stakeholders. A representative cross-section of these players at many levels of responsibility gathers to share ideas, identify strategies and make commitments to achieve measurable goals.

Approach

The Future Search Conference is held over a two and a half day period and works optimally with a group of 60-80. That number would give pause to many leaders. How is it possible for a group that size to agree on anything? When the idea of a collaborative effort comes up, most conveners and even practitioners start thinking about how to keep the group to a “manageable” size. 12-15 sounds doable, 20 is a stretch, 25-30 is getting into the realm of the uncontrollable.

And control is the issue. The Future Search method rejects tight facilitator control over the flow of the meeting and the whole idea that a group needs to be strictly guided toward a predefined goal. Instead the role of the facilitator is to explain the overall boundaries and tasks of each process phase but leave most of the meeting to self-managing work teams of 6-8 persons.

Conference Tasks

The conference divides the time into five segments, each with its specific task, and these are carried out through the alternation of work team and full group dialogue. In addition, there is an alternation of work teams that mix different stakeholder groups with those that consist of members of a single group.

The reason for the two types of work teams comes from a specific theory of Differentiation/Integration. The single stakeholder interest groups need to clarify their own needs during a large planning session (differentiation) but then intersperse with the other groups to define the common goals they can only accomplish by working together (integration). The work teams also need to participate in whole group dialogue for each task to ensure that everyone is aware of specific ideas and overall trends of thinking.

Here is the specific sequence of the conference, as summarized at the Future Search website:

Agenda

Day 1 Afternoon:

  • Task 1: Focus on Past
    People make time lines of key events in the world, their own lives, and in the history of the future search topic. Small groups tell stories about each time line and the implications of their stories for the work they have come to do.
  • Task 2: Focus On Present, External Trends
    The whole group makes a “mind map” of trends affecting them now and identifies those trends most important for their topic.

Day 2 Morning:

  • Task 2 Continued: Stakeholder Response To External Trends
    Stakeholder groups report what they are proud of and sorry about in the way they are dealing with the future search topic.
  • Task 2 Continued: Focus On The Present; Owning Our Actions
    Stakeholder groups describe what they are doing now about key trends and what they want to do in the future.

Day 2 Aternoon:

  • Task 3: Ideal Future Scenarios
    Diverse groups put themselves into the future and describe their preferred future as if it has already been accomplished.
  • Task 4: Identify Common Ground
    Diverse Groups post themes they believe are common ground for everyone.

Day 3 Morning:

  • Task 4 Continued: Confirm Common Ground
    Whole group dialogues to agree on common ground.
  • Task 5: Action Planning
    Volunteers sign up to implement action plans.

Caveats

Successful implementation depends on effective organizational leadership with clear purpose and commitment to collaboration. These decision-makers also need to take part in the process itself, both because they are necessary to confirmation of common ground and action steps and also to reaffirm their commitment to follow-up through their visible involvement.

An effective Future Search Conference also depends on extensive planning by a diverse group that can get all participants to the meeting. The members of this steering committee need to become thoroughly familiar with the principles and methods of Future Search to ensure that they share direction of process planning with a consulting facilitator.

This process focuses on future possibilities rather than on past problems. It is not the appropriate method for conflict resolution or for the reconciliation of deep value differences. Groups of differing values certainly participate but they focus on the future actions for which collaboration among diverse groups is necessary.

Future Search is one of most time-tested large group methods for whole system change and adaptation to new conditions. It has been applied in many different settings around the world, like Open Space Technology, and merits close consideration by any group committed to collaborative methods for planning its future.

Resources

There is an active network of practitioners who spend a great deal of time mentoring newcomers. Their website is: Future Search Network.

                        author

John Folk-Williams

I’m John Folk-Williams, the publisher and editor of Cross Collaborate. Since the early 1980s, I’ve been a practitioner and writer in the field of public policy collaboration, interest-based negotiation, mediation and the involvement of citizens in the decisions that affect their lives. A site like this is itself a collaboration… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

“Death by a thousand paper cuts.”

PGP Mediation Blog by Phyllis G. PollackThe New York Times on August 1, 2020 published an article on microaggressions in the medical profession. (“For Doctors of Color, Microaggressions Are All Too Familiar” by...

By Phyllis Pollack
Category

The Expedited Jury Act Has Come To California!

From the Blog of Phyllis G. Pollack. While none of us ADR Professionals were looking, California enacted a new form of alternative dispute resolution in the form of a summary...

By Phyllis Pollack
Category

Complexity Matters

International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution In his book “In the Name of Identity: Violence and the Need to Belong”, French-Lebanese novelist Amin Maalouf argues that group violence is...

By Roi Ben-Yehuda

Find a Mediator

X
X
X