When an Apology Sets the Tone of a Dispute in Mediation

For commercial mediators it is obvious that commercial interests such as the need to make a profit are the most important incentives for the parties to settle, in the context of course of their legal rights. But in practice and in theory, attention to psychological or personal interests (e.g. reputation, autonomy, status or acknowledgement) is often key to resolve commercial disputes.

Collaborative or joint problem solving is difficult, and sometimes not possible, until the underlying personal interests of the parties in dispute, have been addressed.

The mediator in a multi-million rand divorce case recently demonstrated the power of an apology. The husband, a successful entrepreneur, had had a string of affairs after the birth of the couple’s first child. When the wife found out about his infidelity she immediately packed her bags and sued for divorce. The husband adamantly denied ever having an affair and his estranged wife responded by systematically increasing her claims against him.

At the mediation, the mediator asked the husband during a private session that if true, what would he fear most about admitting that he had the affairs. The attorney objected to the hypothetical question but relented after the mediator assured them that the private session is entirely confidential. The husband saw an opportunity in the hypothetical conversation to clarify his own fears.  He said what he would fear most is that his wife would become even angrier than she already was. The mediator asked him to consider, counter-intuitively, whether admitting and apologizing may not have the opposite effect on her.

Two days later in a follow up session the husband broke the “news” to his wife that he had been unfaithful and apologized.  For a moment the wife appeared shattered, the husband’s eyes were downcast. The mediator was about to call for a private session but the wife turned to her husband, “now I may one day be able to forgive the father of my child.” She did not want a private session. After many hours of tough mediation the material aspects of the dispute were settled in a way that would never have been possible if the husband had not made the apology.

Commercial mediators may pride themselves on being hard-nosed, but attending to the underlying personal (psychological) interests of the parties often paves the way for the parties to constructively settle the material aspects of their dispute. Or as Francois Botha, University of Cape Town’s mediation expert and musician prefers to say, “sets the tone for constructive negotiation.”


Jacques Joubert

Jacques Joubert is a practicing mediator and independent mediation analyst in South Africa. He practiced law in South Africa and Canada, but now specializes in alternative dispute resolution.  MORE >

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


Why Divorce Mediation Makes Sense

During my more than 30 years of practicing law, I have found that the great majority of divorcing couples are unaware of an alternative to going to court and having...

By Thomas Nares

The Application of Mediation Skills and Principles to Selected Investigations

INTRODUCTION My involvement in formal workplace investigations concerning interpersonal conflicts has always left me with the feeling that there must be a better way of dealing with these matters. Whilst...

By Will Parkes

The Palestinian Non-Governmental Organization Network: Mediating in the Midst of Conflict

Introduction The Palestinian Non-Governmental Organizations Network (PNGO) is a group of 133 NGOs in the West Bank and Gaza whose mission is to establish an independent and democratic Palestinian state...

By Amjad Shawa, Donald Mellman, Husam El-NouNou

Find a Mediator