At the recent ABA Section on Dispute Resolution spring meeting, I attended one program whose title promised an answer to the fascinating question “What Do Litigators Want?” when it comes to mediator practices.
All well and good, but the question I was most interested in was very different: “What do your clients want? ”
Alas, I never got a straight answer, although the guy sitting behind me whispered his thanks in my ear and said, “I’m glad you asked that. I’m a client myself, and I can tell you right now, my lawyers don’t have a clue what I want.”
So what can we – attorneys and mediators alike – do to help clients choose and participate fully and meaningfully in the right process for them and their dispute? Here’s my modest proposal, with a tip of the hat to Joseph P. McMahon, Leonard Riskin, and Nancy Welsh:
That would at least be a start. If you have other ideas, by all means, weigh in. I’m all ears.
This article first appeared on the Herbert Smith Freehills Arbitration Notes, here. International arbitration continues to play an increasingly important role in Australia. In this note we canvass some of...
By Guillermo García-Perrote, Leon ChungCMP Resolution Blog by Lesley Allport and Katherine Graham.Our new research with HPMA and Selenity explored the state of employee relations (ER) in the NHS and how HR dealt with...
By Lesley AllportThanks to google translate (daily destroying God's work on the Tower of Babel) I can bring you this mediation war story (loosely and imperfectly translated from a German mediation blog...
By Victoria Pynchon