From Rina Goodman’s Transforming Conflict Blog
There are some things one remembers even though they may never have happened.
HAROLD PINTER, Old Times
[This is the first part of a series on this topic.]
When I was very young, my grandmother enjoyed telling me about a very special time when she was traveling by train from New York City to spend the weekend with my parents, sister, and me on Long Island. In this story (which she claimed to be true), the train had made one of its usual stops before reaching our town when a cute, fluffy kitten stepped off the platform and onto the train. In this story, my grandmother watched this little kitten as it walked right up to her and, without a word (ok, I added that part), leapt onto her lap, curled up, and fell fast asleep. “Why didn’t you bring it home to me?” I would ask each time she repeated this story, as if, by changing the story, she could change the outcome in real life. “Because,” she’d remind me, “when we arrived at the next stop and the doors opened, the kitty woke up, jumped off my lap, and walked right out the door before I could stop it!”
The implausability of the story my grandmother told never struck me when I was young. As an adult, talking about this with my mother, I suddenly understand that my grandmother’s “memory” probably was constructed, based, perhaps, on something that really did happen and colored, somewhat, too, by some wishful thinking and her desire to please a wistful grandchild.
Memories are the stuff of literature and art, enriching our collective imagination and culture. But as we know, they also can be inaccurate and even false. In The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers, Daniel L. Schacter sums up his explanation for why memories are not carbon copies of what we perceive with our senses:
We extract key elements from our experiences and store them. We then recreate or reconstruct our experiences rather than retrieve copies of them. Sometimes, in the process of reconstructing we add on feelings, beliefs, or even knowledge we obtained after the experience. In other words, we bias our memories of the past by attributing to them emotions or knowledge we acquired after the event.
It’s important to understand that, with rare exceptions, no one’s memory is absolutely precise. Absent hard evidence such as recordings or writing, there is a reasonable chance that your recollection is, well, just as faulty as the other person’s.
So what’s the problem? The problem occurs when we rely on memory for making judgments and decisions that are life-altering while discounting evidence that a contrary view may be equally reasonable.
The following excerpt from the PBS Benjamin Franklin webpage, Citizen Ben, demonstrates the wisdom of Lax' and Sebenius' advice that every successful negotiation requires moves away from the table to set ...By Victoria Pynchon
JAMS ADR Blog by Chris PooleAs part of a broader commitment to expand JAMS’ global footprint, the JAMS International Operations group recently organized an event in Beijing, China. The conference,...By Ranse Howell
Every experienced mediator I know has developed an individual style. The mediator’s opening statement, our use of caucuses (or not), the degree of evaluation with which we are comfortable, and...By Jonathan W. Reitman