The Trading Zone in Mediation of Employment Disputes

Sometimes I feel like I’m in the middle of a tug-of-war. This week I had the anomolous situation of having two nearly identical full day cases back to back. In the first, the Plaintiff started the demand at $1 million and Defense offered $30,000 (the equivalent to one year of salary). She was alleging age discrimination, though the Company had laid her off in a reduction in force and she was only 42. In the second, Plaintiff started the demand at $200,000.00 (Plaintiff was also earning $30,000 per year, also sued under the Fair Employment and Housing Act for disability discrimination and was also laid off, but for “cause” which he believed was pretextual) and Defendant made an opening offer of $15,000. The second case settled for mid-$80,000.00 at about 7:00 PM, but the first case is “stuck” and impassed at 9:00 PM when the parties were at $80,000 and $100,000. Both sides had reached their “limit” and so had a very tired and exasperated mediator who had worked all day to get the parties into exactly that zone. So the question this week is how does a mediator work to tug the parties into the reasonable “trading zone” so that the case can be settled on the day of mediation?

In the second case, bracketing was an effective means of getting the parties familiar with the “Zone of Possible Agreement”. But in the first case, those zones simply did not overlap. The offers were in the multiple $100,000’s and on the defense side stayed well-below $100,000 all day. Still, with such unrealistic expectations, I was reluctant to do a mediator’s proposal under $100,000.00 because Plaintiff’s counsel convinced me his client would reject it. Although I am confident that both cases will settle and that both were greatly assisted by the mediator’s efforts, the ultimate objective in every negotiation is to “close the deal”. Does anyone have thoughts on how to avoid this “tug of war” and get within the trading zone sooner so that at 9:00 PM when mediator and parties are exhausted and depleted, the parties don’t give up and abandon the effort to “close”?

                        author

Jan Frankel Schau

Attorney Jan Frankel Schau is a highly skilled neutral, engaged in full-time dispute resolution. Following a successful career spanning two decades in litigation, she has mediated over 700 cases for satisfied clients. Ms. Schau understands the nuances of trial and settlement practice as well as client relations and balancing the… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Questions and Answers for Parties to Mediation: Mediation and the Americans with Disabilities Act

Introduction The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act) make it unlawful to discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability.(1) This...

By Managing Editor
Category

Lawyers’ Math and Mediation

Legend has it that a judge once stated aloud, “the older a case gets the less valuable it becomes” (to the litigants). Over 25 years as a mediator has confirmed...

By Donald Cripe
Category

Grievance Procedures and Mediation Policy Goals

Just Court ADR by Susan M. Yates,Jennifer Shack, Heather Scheiwe Kulp, and Jessica Glowinski.Parties to court mediation in Florida have the opportunity to submit their complaints regarding a mediator to...

By Jennifer Shack

Find a Mediator

X
X
X