The Psychology of Conflict and the Art of Compassion

Conflict is inevitable, wouldn’t you agree? Yet, many of us are conflict-avoidant while others readily engage. Regardless, conflict is uncomfortable with long-lasting effects on how we live– unless we make conscious choices about what we can do differently.

I grew up in a family of nine (yes, nine children and, because so many ask, no, we’re not Catholic). Being on the younger end (7th of 9 with a 4-year gap between the first six and the last three), the three little kids were instructed to be “seen and not heard.” Not only did I grow up in what many would consider typical of a small company or department within a large organization, I was also raised in the midst of a family-owned business. Conflict was abundant! Combine this chaotic family dynamic with cultural and generational influences (and, unfortunately, few if any obvious role models), and it’s not surprising that I rarely observed the ability to navigate successfully through conflict.

These experiences inspired me early on to simply observe human behavior and, in my innocence, try to make sense of the chaos I observed in how people did and did not connect, communicate, or succeed in relationships. Even more importantly, I learned the significance of how we impact and influence people, both positively and negatively. It took me a long time to find my “voice” and discover how I really showed up. My journey led to a mission of helping people find their identities, their voices, and their futures. Although crazy and chaotic, my upbringing was a gift. Through experience and insight, I am now able to help people just like you reach resolution and make important life decisions by reducing the emotional umbrella that so often coexists with conflict.

Anytime two people come together, there are likely to be differences in their beliefs, expectations, attitudes, concern, hopes and values (or what I call “The BEACH” – more on this later). Although rarely fun, these differences and the conflicts that result are not always a bad thing. When managed well, navigating through conflict can generate creativity and lead to increased understanding, improved relations (with self and others), and better outcomes (not to mention improved reputations for the ability to solve conflict). To gain value from conflict, understanding the dynamics behind human behavior goes a long way toward knowing how you as the mediator can help parties navigate through their differences and actually resolve their conflict.

According to British barrister and mediator Paul Randolph, in his book on The
Psychology of Conflict (2016, foreword by Nobel Laureate Archbishop Desmond
Tutu), today’s mediator can benefit tremendously from understanding the
psychology behind human behavior. When we as mediators have the skills and
knowledge to read the available clues in how people show up and what that
means, we are able to facilitate more effective resolution whether it be in the
commercial, family, community or employment arenas.

As evidenced in the growing number of workshops and written works like
Randolph’s, the legal community is starting to recognize how emotional
intelligence, i.e. the understanding of the psychology behind human behavior, is an
essential tool in the successful resolution of conflicts during litigation. As a
psychologist, this realization is nothing new and something long emphasized in the
mediation training programs I’ve taught throughout North America over the years.
However, I know from my years of teaching at California Western School of Law in
San Diego as an Adjunct Professor in their Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program, my second- and
third-year law students were oftentimes astounded by how much psychology played a role in effective
negotiation and mediation. Many had never taken a psychology course much less had an awareness of the role
emotions play in conflict and how to defuse negatively charged parties. If this was true in 2008-2012 when I
was teaching, imagine how many legal professionals practicing today lack any knowledge around psychology.

Many people worldwide connect a sense of happiness with a feeling of warm-heartedness. If you have a pet,
particularly a dog or a cat, you know that even animals display behaviors of compassion. When it comes to
human beings, we have the ability to add the notion of “intelligence” to compassion. But just what type of
intelligence are we talking about? Is it our intellectual intelligence that makes a difference or is it something
newer to our understanding, i.e. emotional intelligence? Destructive emotions are related to ignorance of
human dynamics and tend to fuel the conflict no matter how smart anyone is. Compassion, on the other hand,
is a constructive emotion that requires awareness and emotional, rather than intellectual, intelligence.

Consequently, both compassion and emotional intelligence (E.I.) can be taught and learned. The process starts
with building our emotional intelligence in four key areas to help us shift our mindset and dive deeper as
mediators in a way that creates psychological safety for ourselves and our parties in conflict. To build E.I.,
Daniel Goleman, the Father of E.I., says it starts with self-awareness and self-management followed by other
awareness and then relationship management.

Difficult people throughout the world are often quite welleducated
but that doesn’t mean they recognize how they show up
and impact others, oftentimes quite negatively. If we don’t exercise
awareness of self and others to pay attention to the behavioral
clues presented by parties in conflict and choose appropriate
techniques to facilitate the process, the fear and anxiety
experienced by parties in conflict can easily give way to anger and
negative behavior. As mediators, we should know and understand
that the opposite of fear is trust. When people trust, they tie into a
feeling of “warm-heartedness,” boosting confidence in trying to
resolve conflict.

When we shift our mindset around compassion, we actually redirect what happens inside of us physiologically.
When we show warm-heartedness (or compassion), we reduce blood pressure, stress, anxiety and improve
health. When we’re in that calmer state, we can reasonably process and engage effectively, radically improving
our relationships with self and others.

When the stakes are high and conflicting opinions prevail, trying to remain
cool and logical can feel like a losing proposition. Understanding the
cognitions, behaviors, and reactions (aka the psychology) behind the
conflict is vital to working at the mediation table. The mediator’s ability to
connect and build trust quickly is strengthened when we show up with
empathy, creating a sense of well-being. A lack of compassion and social
connectedness leads to isolation and fear, a sense of abandonment,
feelings of exclusion, as well as negative self-worth. Each of these
elements are core tenets behind the psychology of people in conflict and
can trigger the basic drive to survive, i.e. the fight, flight and freeze
responses.

A show of compassion reduces fear as it reflects a concern for others’ well-being and builds trust. Influence is
not about money or power; it’s about building trust. And, trust is the foundation of any relationship, particularly
in mediation when trying to reach resolution among parties in conflict. When we’re under the influence of
anger or or some other negative emotion, we’re limited in our ability to use our cognitive brain to take a realistic
view of the situation. When the mind is compassionate, it is calm and we’re able to use our sense of reason
practically, realistically, and with determination.

Another valuable contributor to understanding conflict is Amy C. Edmondson in her book Teaming: How
Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge. Engaging in conflict productively cannot be
accomplished by avoiding emotions and personal differences. A state of openness is required. These are skills
that start with a mindset and a willingness to explore, rather than shy away from, different beliefs and values. It
means acknowledging emotional reactions openly and exploring what led to them, rather than pretending they
don’t exist. Otherwise, emotions are the driving force that overwhelms reason in dispute situations and explains
the ‘irrational’ behavior that can result from those caught up in conflict.

Edmonson looked at the research by two cognitive psychologists, Janet Metcalfe
and Walter Mischel, who demonstrated that we have two distinct cognitive
systems through which we process events. Trying to understand the
mechanisms that allow people to delay gratification, a crucial ability for
everything from goal achievement to weight control, Metcalfe and Mischel
uncovered two types of human cognition which they called “hot” and “cool.” The
hot system, when engaged, triggers people to respond emotionally and quickly.
In this case, they are often said to speak or act in the “heat of the moment.” The
cool system, in contrast, is deliberate and careful. When using our cool system,
we can slow down and gather our thoughts. The cool system is the basis for selfregulation
and self-control. Consequently, it is a necessary tool to use when
conflict occurs.

When working with professionals, I routinely use the Conflict Dynamics Profile
(CDP) to identify how we show up in our communication, and/or conflict, with
others. This assessment uncovers eight destructive and seven constructive
behaviors people naturally use, although they are often unaware of how they
show up with others. The CDP also reveals our “hot buttons” around nine
behaviors from others that typically trigger us into emotional reactions. Like
compassion, we can learn how to show up more influentially and persuasively for
positive impact on those around us, whether we’re in mediation or not. It takes psychological awareness and
an openness to choose differently. It’s all about balance!

You probably have asked yourself “Why do sensible, intelligent, rational
people appear to act so irrationally? Why do commercial business
people behave so unprofessionally and in such a child-like manner
when in conflict? What is it that so quickly drives people into intense
and bitter disputes?” These very questions, as Randolph put forth in his
book, were the very questions that led to my doctoral dissertation in
2014 when I studied the psychology of good bosses vs. bad bosses. As a
workplace mediator with over 25 years of experience, I was intrigued to
dive deeper to understand why and how some really intelligent people
could be such poor stewards of others, particularly as leaders. Those
research findings now serve as the foundation of my book in progress
called Leading Consciously Now.

“Winning” the argument does not usually produce the best solution, yet this is often the tack in litigated cases.
The task of the mediator is instead focused on navigating parties to a place and mindset where they recognize
that the best solutions usually involve some integration and synthesis of differences, not one person prevailing
over the other. When people put their heads together, truly intent on learning from one another, they can
almost always come up with a solution that is better than anyone could have come up with alone.

Why is this so important? Drawing again on Randolph’s work, those involved in disputes or any argument
fervently believe their position (perspective) to be the one and only objective and universal truth. They are
driven by a belief that a judge, arbitrator, mediator or other conflict resolver will eventually agree with their
objective truth. However, when we use the 360-perspective, we quickly learn that our truth is merely
subjective. No matter how intelligent, experienced, or advanced, we can only see or understand so much until
we seek to understand how others perceive the same issue or circumstance. The mediator’s task is to bring out
perspective from different vantage points.

Without a shift in mindset or a change in attitude, the parties in conflict are likely to remain in the same
entrenched positions they had when entering mediation, creating little prospect of settling their dispute. When
confronted with such resistance to change, I gently challenge such parties in caucus by first clarifying my role
by stating “as your mediator, my role is not to take sides or determine whether your position is right or wrong.
Instead, it is to help the parties reach mutual resolution.” So I ask two questions, “How’s that (position) working
for you? Is it getting you what you want?” The shift in their brains becomes evident through their subtle shifts
in behavior. I often share Rumi’s quote (the 13th century poet, jurist, and philosopher), “Out beyond ideas of
wrong-doing and right-doing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there.”

American psychologist Wayne Dyer, author of A New Way of Thinking, a New Way of Being:
Experiencing the Tao Te Ching (2009) brings to light the ancient Tao observation: ‘If we
change the way we look at things, the things we look at change’ (a quote also attributed to
Max Planck, the twentieth-century German physicist). This is where “The BEACH” comes in
when we use the 360 Perspective and dive deeper through active listening. When we
structure our listening using “The Beach” metaphor, we can more easily focus on what
BELIEFS people are trying to express, their EXPECTATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS or ATTITUDES,
their CONCERNS as well as their HOPES. As mediators, or active listeners in any
conversation, the ability to pull these nuggets out from what people are saying is magical and people truly feel
that you “get” what they’re saying. And, I note,”acknowledging” what someone says is NOT the same as
“agreeing” with his/her position.

The psychologically-informed mediator realizes that the application of logic or reason alone does not achieve
this shift in perception. In fact, such an approach has little or no effect in conflict situations and may even be
counter-productive. When in conflict, parties are rarely in a frame of mind to listen to reason and neither think
nor behave rationally or logically. Their perceptions are likely to be polar opposites, believing their own
perception as the only real truth. I share this excerpt from Randolph’s book as it can’t be said any better. “The
variety of perceptions that can exist in any one given situation was aptly epitomized by the American comic
George Carlin when he said: Have you ever noticed when you are driving on the freeway that anyone who is
driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac?’ In this scenario, the three
drivers each perceive the other to be either an idiot or a maniac, while at the same time perceiving themselves
to be entirely normal.”

To penetrate such resistance and shift perspectives, the mediator must first dive deeper to disarm the anger,
acknowledge the emotions and help the parties feel heard so that passions can subside. Doing so helps move
the parties to a place where they are more amenable to reason and are ready to listen. This is the point where
the mediator’s own emotional intelligence and communication skills are essential. Active listening and the
capacity to build a trusting relationship by creating a strong rapport with those in dispute (so that parties feel
truly heard) is key. We can then draw upon the four tenets of emotional intelligence as defined by Daniel
Goleman: Self-awareness, Self-management, Other-awareness and Relationship-management.

As Rumi so eloquently quoted, “Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I
am changing myself.”

The ability and capacity to create trust and rapport does not necessarily come
intuitively or naturally. Instead, just like compassion, it can be learned. As
Stephen Covey says in 1989 book, Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, “the
biggest problem about communication is that we do not listen to understand,
but instead listen to reply.” We want to shift from seeking to be understood to
seeking first to understand. To listen, we must first be silent! This is where “The
BEACH” comes in as a powerful tool in structuring our listening for
understanding and demonstrating the compassion needed for trust.

All conflict is emotional and all emotions are both thoughts and sensations. The
magical power of mediation lies in the ability of the mediator to read the
behavioral clues and facilitate the process using skills and techniques that allow
the parties to feel truly heard.
What does your mindset (or perspective) reflect when you show up in
mediation? What are your attitudes about emotion that might just be getting in your way? Perhaps it’s time to
develop your emotional intelligence and build your understanding around the psychology of conflict!

YOUR PRESENCE MATTERS…

                        author

Debra Dupree

Dr. D is a dynamic and engaged speaker, never failing to excite her audience. She has nearly 30 years of professional experience as an accomplished corporate consultant and keynote speaker.  Companies such as Teradata, Yamaha, Stanford University, Cal Western School of Law, and the Department of Navy have called upon… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Alabama Mediation Program Successfully Reduces Civil Court Docket

JAMS ADR Blog by Chris PooleA mediation program recently established in Alabama’s Lauderdale County Circuit Court has shown solid success resolving some of the most intractable cases headed for jury...

By Chris Poole
Category

The “Attorney Friendly” Mediator

One of the hottest topics in mediation currently involves the question of attorney versus non-attorney mediators. Specifically, the concern of attorneys in general, regards a potential loss of legal business...

By Jon Linden
Category

Why I Said “HR Should Be Ashamed of Itself”

CMP Resolution Blog by Lesley Allport and Katherine Graham.It’s no secret that I can be spikey – and I sometimes rue the things I say after I’ve said them. And,...

By Katherine Graham

Find a Mediator

X
X
X