The Emergence of ODR

Novo Justice Blog by Colin Rule

Darin Thompson on the IT Law Community web site:

“Shifting the Dispute Resolution Paradigm

The Commission’s proposal represents a bold statement on the need for an accessible, well-designed and integrated system for resolving consumer disputes in the EU. If implemented successfully, it could lead to significant new dispute resolution options and other trust building mechanisms for consumers and traders and, in turn, more consumer-driven economic activity across the EU’s single market.

For the ADR and ODR communities, it will almost certainly prove to be one of the bigger developments in recent years. It could also serve to precipitate a transformation of ADR from its process-reliant, principled model into a faster, simpler and more results-oriented variant specifically designed for low-value consumer transactions.

It will also provide a fertile testing ground for the theory that technology-facilitated ADR, commonly known as ODR, will become the next wave in dispute resolution. If any tensions should emerge between these (at times) divergent approaches, they will not last long given the pace of technology. As we continue to become more dependent on IT and the Internet for all things, including commerce, the development of technology-based dispute resolution processes is inevitable.

For consumers, increased access to ADR will also inevitably prove to be a benefit. For the EU, the proposal will bring ADR and ODR to consumers in the short term. It should also precipitate larger scale justice transformation towards non-court, technology supported and user-focused dispute-resolution processes in the long term. Indeed, technology is well placed to be the catalyst to bring about this badly needed transformation. If the Commission’s proposal stays on track, this change will now formally be under way in the EU.”

Here’s my favorite quote: “As we continue to become more dependent on IT and the Internet for all things, including commerce, the development of technology-based dispute resolution processes is inevitable.”

Thanks, Darin, for summarizing recent developments so well. I’m going to send this to a lot of people!

read more:
http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed23780

                        author

Colin Rule

Colin Rule is CEO of Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc. ("RIS"), home of Mediate.com, MediateUniversity.com, Arbitrate.com, CaseloadManager.com and a number of additional leading online dispute resolution initiatives.  From 2017 to 2020, Colin was Vice President for Online Dispute Resolution at Tyler Technologies. Tyler acquired Modria.com, an ODR provider that Colin co-founded,… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

The Avoiding Culture in Organizations

Many organizations seem to have a strong avoiding culture, which can best be investigated with a specific change in TKI instructions. Instead of asking members to respond to the thirty items in...

By Ralph Kilmann
Category

Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator — Are We There Yet?

This article first appeared on the Disputing Blog, here.  Attorney Paul Bennett Marrow, member of the American Arbitration Association’s Commercial Panel and Domestic Arbitration instructor at New York Law School, Mansi Karol, Director of...

By Beth Graham
Category

Actions Do Have Consequences

From the Blog of Phyllis G. Pollack.Several weeks ago, I, again, helped my colleague who teaches mediation by supervising two of her students while they conducted an actual mediation in...

By Phyllis Pollack

Find a Mediator

X
X
X