Settlement Authority: Don’t Leave Home Without It

A successful mediation is one that ends the litigation through a negotiated settlement. Granted that there may be other benefits to mediation, such as exchanging information with the other side, getting input from the mediator about the strengths and weaknesses of one’s case, or finding out if the case is likely to settle, but most lawyers and clients use mediation because they want to an end to the litigation. Failure to reach a settlement generally leaves everyone with a sense of disappointment.


The most common causes of a failed mediation have been identified as:


1. Absence of persons with real settlement authority;

2. Lack of a genuine intent to settle; and

3. Choosing the wrong time to mediate.


This paper deals with settlement authority, which is the most critical of the three.


Settlement authority means the authority to agree to whatever is necessary and prudent in order to dispose of the case. Often we see client representatives being sent to mediation who purport to have full authority to settle but who in reality have only limited authority based upon their side’s unilateral evaluation of the dispute. Any attempt by the mediator or the other side to convince them that the case should really be settled on terms that are beyond that authority is generally futile.


Before long the lack of authority becomes apparent to everyone. If the other side is fully empowered to settle, they will become justifiably upset at the uneven playing field and will probably lose interest in further mediation. Attempts to bring them back to the table at a later time may not succeed.


Sometimes it is not possible to have the person present who has unlimited discretion to settle. In such cases I generally recommend that the mediation be rescheduled until that person is available. As a last resort, you may have to send someone with a reasonable amount of authority and make arrangements to have the ultimate decision-maker available on standby or by telephone. In that event be sure to secure the agreement of the mediator and the other parties in advance.


It is the mediator’s job to require that the individuals who are authorized to settle the case will be present. If you really want to have a successful mediation, do not try to mislead the mediator or the other side about this critical element of the process.

                        author

Michael P. Carbone

MICHAEL P. CARBONE is a senior mediator who has also served as an arbitrator and court-appointed referee. His dispute resolution practice has been built over a period of more than 25 years and covers a wide range of fields.   His exceptional combination of transactional and litigation experience enables him to handle complex litigation… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

All the Mediation Emotions from A to A

Amy Lieberman, executive director of Insight Employment Mediation in Scottsdale, Arizona, recently published an intriguing article in the AAA Dispute Resolution Journal, The "A" List of Emotions in Mediation from...

By Victoria Pynchon
Category

Reflective Practice: In Their Voices Video Conversation Project – Interview with Sue Bronson

Reflective Practice: In Their Voices Video Conversation Project For more information on this project and on Reflective Practice generally, see TheReflectivePractitioner.com Interview with Sue Bronson Mediator Sue Bronson doesn't rest...

By Sue Bronson
Category

Lawyers Benefit from Transformative Mediation – Video

Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation by Dan SimonWhy hasn’t transformative mediation swept the world of litigated disputes with represented parties? A new video reveals that there’s no good...

By Dan Simon

Find a Mediator

X
X
X