Resolving frozen Misperceptions between two Warring Parties

I’m publishing this newsletter series to discuss the nuances of the four timeless topics for people and organizations: conflict, change, transformation, and consciousness. Please subscribe to never miss an article.

I would like to describe a simple method I have used to resolve the extreme polarization that can occur in high-intensity conflicts, where people have deeply stereotyped misperceptions of the other that remain frozen in time — and thus inaccessible. This simple method can also raise the empathy of both parties…to spend some time in the shoes of the other… as long as each party has some measure of emotional intelligence and mental health outside that polarized situation.

I ask each party to make three lists: (1) This is how I perceive the other party (their needs, motives, biases, goals, concerns, prejudices, blindsides, etc.,, or whatever seems to be relevant to the conflict situation). (2) This is how I perceive myself (my needs, motives, biases, etc.). (3) This is how I think the other party sees me (my best guess of their view of my needs, motives, and so forth). Ideally, these three lists are written on easel pad paper, so they can later be posted on the wall of the room, very visible and readable for all to see.

Naturally, it’s important to remind each party to be especially candid and to be as specific as possible in compiling their three lists, not evasive or general. They should also write very legibly.

When the three lists are complete, they’re posted on one wall in the room. Each party then takes turns presenting its list to the other. Then there is a brief period of “clarifying questions” (no debate) to make sure that what is written on the lists is understood by all. This part needs to be facilitated, so the “clarifying” questions are asked to understand what is written on paper (regardless if one agrees or disagrees with what had been put into words), but certainly not to attack its meaning or validity.

The “fun” begins (yes, laughter finally seeps into the conflict situation) and the “learning” begins (a few “aha” moments are usually experienced) when each party is then asked to compare (1) how each sees itself versus how the other sees it and (2) how each party sees the other versus how the other party sees itself.

As can be expected, there usually are huge GAPS in these perceptual comparisons, which is precisely what the conflict has been all about…perhaps the very root of the conflict.

The parties are then asked to suggest what is the source of these large GAPS: How did such huge misperceptions and distortions come about? In essence, this question helps the parties define the source of the problem, so both parties have a better chance of solving it.

At this point in the discussion, the different conflict-handling modes can be introduced (or reviewed) so the parties see that they have several behavioral choices regarding how they approach their GAPS and long-standing conflicts: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating — particularly the fundamental differences between the distributive and the integrative dimensions on the TKI Conflict Model.

There might be no miracle here for parties whose prime motives are anger, rage, and hate toward the other, and that being locked into such perpetual combat satisfies more (pathological) needs than what would be experienced by coming to a peaceful resolution (since peace can throw some people’s life out of whack). In other words, some parties may need their prolonged conflict in order to maintain their familiar pain…and that’s just the way they are — for now.

But when there is at least a minimum desire or hope to satisfy healthy needs, so everyone can move forward in life, this simple method can help conflicted parties see the source of their debilitating misperceptions and thus gain a necessary dose of empathy, perspective, and peace.

Kilmann Diagnostics offers a series of eleven recorded online courses and nine assessment tools on the four timeless topics: conflict management, change management, consciousness, and transformation. For more information about these online courses and how to earn your Certification in Conflict and Change Management with the Thomas-Kilmann Instrument (TKI), visit: https://kilmanndiagnostics.com. For the most up-to-date and comprehensive discussion of Dr. Kilmann’s theories and methods for achieving long-term organizational success, see his 2021 Legacy Book: Creating a Quantum Organization.

author

Ralph Kilmann

Ralph H. Kilmann, Ph.D., is CEO and Senior Consultant at Kilmann Diagnostics in Newport Coast, California. Formerly, he was the George H. Love Professor of Organization and Management at the Katz School of Business, University of Pittsburgh—which was his professional home for thirty years. He earned both his B.S. and M.S.… MORE

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Perfect Storm Likely To Boost Mediation of Financial Services Disputes in 2012

JAMS ADR Blog by Chris PooleThere exists right now a perfect storm of economic, legislative and regulatory conditions that have the potential to profoundly affect the likelihood that mediation will...

By V. James Mann
Category

Avoiding the Holiday Blues During Separation or After Divorce

With some creativity, and openness to future adjustment, separated and divorced couples can preserve key ingredients of the holiday season by pre-planning the children’s shared visits ahead of time. With...

By Dr. Lynne C. Halem
Category

Best Interests and Little Voices: Child Participation in the Family Mediation Dialogue

Mother knows best Listen to your mother It's a scary world out there Mother knows best 1 - Mother Gothel, Tangled “What a bunch of stupid children I have.” -...

By Jennifer Winestone

Find a Mediator

X
X
X