Baltimore Injury Lawyer Blog by John Bratt
One of the many hats I wear at Miller & Zois is that of our in-office appellate specialist. What that really means is that I handle all of our law firm’s personal injury cases that wind up being appealed, and that I accept referrals (from other lawyers only) to handle civil appeals of all types.
One thing I see over and over is briefs from the other side that make the ill-advised choice to attack the trial judge or trial counsel. And I don’t mean with reasoned legal arguments, I mean things that are over-the-top, like allegations that the judge was biased, or ad hominem attacks on the opposing party or their counsel. There are a lot of things wrong with doing that, but the two main ones are 1) it’s unprofessional and 2) making yourself look like a jackass isn’t very persuasive.
If you handle appeals on a regular basis, you should take a look at “Professionalism On Appeal: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly”, an article by Howard J. Bashman, a Philadelphia-area appellate specialist. I think he sums it up nicely by saying: “Indeed, expressing animosity toward opposing counsel on appeal, or toward the trial judge, usually proves to be counterproductive rather than an effective strategy for victory.”
Take a look at his article. I think it’s a refreshing take on the way appellate litigation should be practiced.
Days after June's UK Brexit Referendum, in which 51.89% of the votes cast were in favor of Britain leaving the European Union, US Secretary of State John Kerry advised: It...
By Michael LeathesTwo Minute Trainings by Maria SimpsonLast week I wrote about the lessons learned from General Shinseki’s resignation as Secretary of the VA,including opening communications avenues to people several steps below...
By Maria SimpsonIntroduction Until just recently the construction industry ignored it. But courts like the New York State Supreme Court are now mandating it, public agencies (New York City School Construction Authority)...
By Gary Morgerman
