Professor Amy Schmitz joined the University of Missouri School of Law and the Center for Dispute Resolution as the Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law in 2016. Previously she was a Professor at the University of Colorado School of Law for over 16 years. Prior to teaching, Professor Schmitz practiced law with large law firms in Seattle and Minneapolis, and served as a law clerk for the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit. Professor Schmitz teaches courses in Contracts, Lawyering, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), AI, Data Analytics and the Law, Arbitration, International Arbitration, and Consumer Law. She has been heavily involved in ODR teaching and research for a long time and is a Fellow of the National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution, as well as the Co-Chair of the ABA Technology Committee of the Dispute Resolution Section and the ODR Task Force. She serves on the Association of American Law Schools Executive Committee on Commercial and Consumer Law, was an External Scientific Fellow of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg, and is a researcher with the ACT Project exploring AI and ODR. Professor Schmitz has published over 50 articles in law journals and books, and a book, The New Handshake: Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of Consumer Protection, with Colin Rule.
Contact Amy Schmitz
Arbitration Conversation No. 14: Prof. Maureen Weston from Pepperdine Law School
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Arbitrator Professor Maureen Weston, Professor of Law and Director of the Entertainment, Media & Sports Dispute Resolution Project at Pepperdine Law's Straus Institute.
Arbitration Conversation No. 13: Prof. S.I. Strong of the University of Sydney
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. S.I. Strong of the University of Sydney about trust arbitration.
Arbitration Conversation No. 12: Arbitrator Katherine Haennicke from AAA
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Arbitrator Katherine Haennicke from the American Arbitration Association about pro se parties in arbitration.
Arbitration Conversation No. 11: Theo Cheng on intellectual property arbitration
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews independent arbitrator Theo Cheng on intellectual property arbitration.
The Arbitration Conversation: Amy Schmitz Interviews the Leading Minds in Arbitration
The Arbitration Conversation is a periodic web series where Prof. Amy Schmitz interviews leading thinkers in arbitration around the world. Tune in for new episodes each week.
Lest We Forget the UDRP
As the Covid-19 crisis pushes the world of arbitration into online formats and virtual hearings, this article discusses the existence of one form of online dispute resolution that has been in existence for over two decades, i.e. the Uniform Dispute Resolution Procedures (UDRP) for the resolution of 'internet domain name' or 'cybersquatting' disputes.
Arbitration Conversation No. 1 - Amy Chats with Svetlana Gitman
In this episode of Arbitration Conversation Amy speaks with Svetlana Gitman of the American Arbitration Association
Arbitration Conversation No. 10: Prof. David Horton, UC Davis School of Law
In this episode Amy interviews Professor David Horton of the UC Davis School of Law about infinite arbitration clauses.
Arbitration Conversation No. 9: Charles E. Harris II, Arbitrator and Partner at Mayer Brown in Chicago
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Charles E. Harris II, who is a Partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution Group and the International Arbitration Group at Mayer Brown in Chicago.
Arbitration Conversation No. 8: Prof. Richard Frankel of Drexel University School of Law
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. Richard Frankel, Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Federal Litigation and Appeals Clinic at the Drexel University Thomas Klein School of Law.
Arbitration Conversation No. 7: Prof. Sarah Cole of the Moritz College of Law at OSU
Check out the latest episode of the Arbitration Conversation, where Amy interviews Prof. Sarah Cole of the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.
Arbitration Conversation No. 6: Amy interviews Mohamed Abdel Wahab of the Cairo University Faculty of Law
Check out the latest episode of The Arbitration Conversation where Amy Schmitz interviews Mohamed Abdel Wahab on arbitration in Egypt.
Arbitration Conversation No. 5: Amy interviews Prof. Tom Stipanowich of the Pepperdine Caruso School of Law
Check out the latest episode of The Arbitration Conversation where Amy Schmitz interviews Tom Stipanowich about mixed mode arbitration and his concept of "arbigotiation" which keeps the door open to negotiated or mediated resolutions within an arbitration process.
Arbitration Conversation No. 4: Amy Interviews Prof. Benjamin Davis of University of Toledo College of Law
In this episode Amy Schmitz interviews Ben Davis about diversity in arbitration, with a particular focus on the new Diversity and Inclusion Policy that was recently issued by ICCA (the International Council of Commercial Arbitration).
Arbitration Conversation No. 3: Amy interviews Prof. Bob Bailey of Mizzou Law
In this episode of Arbitration Conversation Amy Schmitz interviews Prof. Bob Bailey of Mizzou Law on the new unanimous Supreme Court decision (authored by Justice Gorsuch) around the enforceability of arbitration for gig workers in the transportation sector and the interpretation of the FAA's applicability in state court.
Arbitration Conversation No. 2 - Amy chats with Professor David Larson
In this episode of Arbitration Conversation Amy speaks with Professor Dave Larson of the Mitchell Hamline School of Law on accessibility in mediation, arbitration, and online dispute resolution
“Business Pays” Rule in California Facing Challenges
On January 1, 2020, a new law in California took effect to provide rights to consumers and employees facing arbitration. The law requires that the business must pay the initial fees or costs of arbitration where the employees or consumers are to arbitrate any claims related to their contracts or state/federal law.
Contract Exclusions Count
New arbitration case denying a motion to compel arbitration of claims alleging violation of the 12-year-old Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act
Discovering Documents from Nonparties in Online Arbitration?
Should a court have the authority to force non-parties to arbitration to comply with the summons and provide testimony that would be transmitted via video conference? If testimony is taken via video conference it might not "be in the physical presence" so the arbitrator wouldn't technically be compelling their “attendance before” the arbitrator.
New NAA Opinion on Requiring Video Hearings
What if one party in an arbitration refuses to use videoconferencing? Should arbitrators be able to order a video hearing over a party's objection?
American Exceptionalism in Consumer Arbitration
“American exceptionalism” has been used to reference the United States’ outlier policies in various contexts, including its love for litigation. Despite Americans’ reverence for their “day in court,” their zest for contractual freedom and efficiency has prevailed to result in U.S. courts’ strict enforcement of arbitration provisions in both business-to-business (“B2B”) and business-to-consumer (“B2C”) contracts.