Online Dispute Resolution

Recently I had a conversation with someone in regards to Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and how the person thought it had less human interaction compared to traditional ADR methods. I responded saying I actually think instead of viewing as ‘less’ or ‘more’, it is another choice for the parties. ODR is a new form of human interaction.

It reminds me of a teaching of impermanence- nothing stays the same regardless of how much you like or dislike it. ODR has arrived because people find it useful with the grwoing use of the internet and computers. It does not mean it is for everyone and it does not have to be. It is just like hybrids versions of ADR- new ones keep popping up as people’s preferences change and evolve.

The variety of ADR services, now including ODR/iDR I think is reflective of the world we currently live in. Yes, we are ‘global citizens’ more now than ever but there is still that uniqueness that is present and should be acknowledged. Mediation via email or txt is str8 2 da pt 4 sum ppl & that is a good thing.

No idea what that means? No idea what the LOL image means? Embrace technology- Learn text talk here.

For others, letting some machine automate some number that is supposed to make both sides happy works for them. For the stubborn and ancient dinosaurs, there is face to face mediation still. Of course the last comment is sarcastic but my point is look how ADR has evolved. It is an example of the impermanence I mentioned earlier. As times change, it is only natural that the way we as conflict resolvers look at conflict and then appropriately adjust to the parties needs. Let’s not forget, it is their process.

Self determination (recently discussed here) is a major reason people turn to ADR. People like having a say in how issues that directly affect them will be decided. Conflict could be broken down into three levels- substantive, psychological and procedural. It is in the third, procedural, where the new world of ODR has given the parties yet another choice on how to interact with the other party.

                        author

Jeff Thompson

Jeff Thompson, Ph.D., is a professor at Lipscomb University, researcher, mediator, and trainer. He is also involved in crisis and hostage negotiation as well as a law enforcement detective. His research includes law enforcement crisis and hostage negotiation in terrorist incidents. He received his doctorate from Griffith University Law School… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Storytelling in Mediation: The Hero’s Journey

Conflict stories comprise the heart and soul of mediation. Beneath their surface-level depictions of events, they reveal the underlying assumptions of the disputing parties, their expectations of each other, and...

By Tom Stringer
Category

Mediation – An Integral Part Of Our Litigation Culture

8 June 09 - Speech by Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, Master of the Rolls - Mediation, an integral part of our litigation culture Littleton Chambers Annual Mediation Evening, 8th June...

By Geoff Sharp
Category

The Future of Mediation: Twenty Predictions for Mediation in 2030

  "Never Make Predictions, Especially About the Future"                                                 Casey Stengel, Baseball Hall of Fame Manager Futurists have already begun violate Casey Stengel's admonition and...

By Forrest (Woody) Mosten

Find a Mediator

X
X
X