ODR and Culture

This chapter is from “Online Dispute Resolution
Theory and Practice,” Mohamed Abdel Wahab, Ethan Katsh & Daniel Rainey ( Eds.), published, sold and distributed by Eleven International Publishing.
The Hague, Netherlands at: www.elevenpub.com
.

This chapter begins with some basic definitions of culture, then address the relationship between ODR technology and culture, and finally offers observations about what may be the short term future of intercultural exchanges mediated by online dispute resolution tools.

Few, if any, topics in the general field of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) draw more attention than the impact of culture on parties in conflict and the processes they use to resolve conflict. This is easy to understand if one begins with the conviction that all dispute resolution, at whatever level, is essentially an exercise in communication: active parties and third parties engage in interactions within one of a number of process models in order to exchange information and reach understanding.

The reader will recognize that exchanging information and achieving understanding can be difficult when there are few overt differences in culture. Even when we are communicating with someone who looks like us, speaks the same language, shares many social rules, shares a national history, etc., the opportunity for misunderstanding is ever present.

As technology shrinks the world and generates ever more opportunity for communicating with those of very different cultures, it would seem reasonable to assume that the opportunity form is understanding and cultural disconnects are also increasing.

In an essay prepared for the Fourth International Online Dispute Resolution Forum, the author argued that one key element driving intercultural misunderstanding in ODR was linked to the basic model of dispute resolution that was dominant at the time – the “North American Model” of dispute resolution.

In this chapter, the author revisits that argument and add some observations about the evolution of ODR internationally over the past five years.

Attachments to this Article

                        author

Daniel Rainey

Daniel Rainey is a mediator, author and trainer, and a principal in Holistic Solutions, Inc., an organisation that offers training and consulting in a variety of conflict engagement modes.  Until 2017, he served as the Chief of Staff for the US National Mediation Board and is the Co-Chair of IMI’s… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Re-imagining Collaborative Law, as well as dispute resolution itself

Dispute Settlement Counselby Michael Zeytoonian.I first heard about Collaborative Law (CL) in 2002 as it began to spread around Massachusetts. It was an inspiring, rational approach to resolving disputes and...

By Michael A. Zeytoonian
Category

When in Conflict, Ask Yourself, “What are the unmet needs?”

Meredith Mediates by Meredith RichardsonWhen you are in conflict, what are your unmet needs?  What are the unmet needs of the person with whom you are in conflict? You may think...

By Meredith Richardson
Category

“Procedural” Apology

Business Conflict Blog by Peter Phillips Richard Nixon was responsible for many teaching moments.  One of my favorites is the advance in American appreciation of the difference between the passive...

By F. Peter Phillips

Find a Mediator

X
X
X