Heller v Uber: The Supreme Court finds arbitration clause unconscionable and establishes new test for determining when to stay litigation in favour of arbitration

Heller v Uber: The Supreme Court finds arbitration clause unconscionable and establishes new test for determining when to stay litigation in favour of arbitration

Heller develops arbitration and contract law in three important ways:

It provides guidance on whether domestic or international arbitration legislation applies;
It develops the competence-competence principle; and
It restates the doctrine of unconscionability.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

OnLine Dispute Resolution: Implications for the ADR Profession

Introduction On June 6-7, 2000, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce sponsored a conference on "Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Transactions in the Borderless Online Marketplace". The...

By Dan DeStephen, John Helie
Category

There Goes That Internet Thingy Again!

Many years ago as I introduced the ADR community to the Internet, I made many bold claims. Some claims were vague and broad, others more specific. In the sense that...

By John Helie
Category

The Federal Government and ADR: How Things Get Done

A myriad of new laws and policies has spawned tremendous growth of federal government alternative dispute resolution (ADR) initiatives. Some of these affect our litigation system, others affect the way...

By Andrew Colsky

Find a Mediator

X
X
X