Mediator Ethics: Conflicts of Interest

1.  Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code. 2. The state of being unimpaired; soundness. 3. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness. ETYMOLOGY: Middle English integrite, from Old French, from Latin integrits, soundness, from integer, whole, complete.

I attended a seminar recently in which a retired Judge-mediator said the following from the podium  — “I don’t tell a new client that I’ve mediated for his opposition before.”

“Hmmmmmmm,” I was thinking, “how’s he going to justify that?”

The answer, unfortunately, was by way of his own self-interest.

“If I disclosed all of my former relationships with attorneys,” the Judge said, “I’d never get any new business.”

I know this mediator; he’s in heavy rotation and is a talkative guy.  So I’m assuming he’s said this before and no one has corrected him, which means he’s not the only one out there who’s a little fuzzy on mediation ethics.

This comment made me decide to address mediation ethics a little more systematically than I have before — beginning with conflicts of interest and using the Association for Conflict Resolution’s Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators as my starting point.

STANDARD III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

I invite comment from my blogging buddies — Diane Levin, Gini Nelson, Stephanie West AllenGeoff Sharp and Christopher Annunziata if they have an extra moment in their day.  Take a look, by the way, at Michael Moffitt’s post on Geoff Sharp’s post on Mediators Who Party with Clients here.

A. A mediator shall avoid a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest during and after a mediation. A conflict of interest can arise from involvement by a mediator with the subject matter of the dispute or from any relationship between a mediator and any mediation participant, whether past or present, personal or professional, that reasonably raises a question of a mediator’s impartiality.

B. A mediator shall make a reasonable inquiry to determine whether there are any facts that a reasonable individual would consider likely to create a potential or actual conflict of interest for a mediator. A mediator’s actions necessary to accomplish a reasonable inquiry into potential conflicts of interest may vary based on practice context.

C. A mediator shall disclose, as soon as practicable, all actual and potential conflicts of interest that are reasonably known to the mediator and could reasonably be seen as raising a question about the mediator’s impartiality. After disclosure, if all parties agree, the mediator may proceed with the mediation.

D. If a mediator learns any fact after accepting a mediation that raises a question with respect to that mediator’s service creating a potential or actual conflict of interest, the mediator shall disclose it as quickly as practicable. After disclosure, if all parties agree, the mediator may proceed with the mediation.

E. If a mediator’s conflict of interest might reasonably be viewed as undermining the integrity of the mediation, a mediator shall withdraw from or decline to proceed with the mediation regardless of the expressed desire or agreement of the parties to the contrary.

F. Subsequent to a mediation, a mediator shall not establish another relationship with any of the participants in any matter that would raise questions about the integrity of the mediation. When a mediator develops personal or professional relationships with parties, other individuals or organizations following a mediation in which they were involved, the mediator should consider factors such as time elapsed following the mediation, the nature of the relationships established, and services offered when determining whether the relationships might create a perceived or actual conflict of interest.

                        author

Victoria Pynchon

Attorney-mediator Victoria Pynchon is a panelist with ADR Services, Inc. Ms. Pynchon was awarded her LL.M Degree in Dispute Resolution from the Straus Institute in May of 2006, after 25 years of complex commercial litigation practice, with sub-specialties in intellectual property, securities fraud, antitrust, insurance coverage, consumer class actions and all… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Mediate.com Featured Blogs Policies

This policy statement governs the selection and operation of Mediate.com Featured Blogs located at www.mediate.com/Blogs. 1. Inclusion Blogs are included, or not, as a Mediate.com Featured Blog upon recommendation and...

By Mediate.com Staff
Category

Thinking Differently

PGP Mediation Blog by Phyllis G. PollackIn 1992, John Gray, Ph.D. published Men Are From Mars, Women are From Venus (HarperCollins Publishing 1992) to explain why men and women have...

By Phyllis Pollack
Category

Arthur Pearlstein: Unintended Consequences – Video

Arthur Pearlstein describes his frustration with the unintended consequences that stem from rule-making.

By Arthur Pearlstein

Find a Mediator

X
X
X