Living with ‘ADR’: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration and Conflict Management in Fortune 1,000 Corporations

Originally published in 19 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1 and
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/16

As attorneys for the world’s most visible clients, corporate counsel played a key role in the transformation of American conflict resolution in the late Twentieth Century. In 1997 a survey of Fortune 1,000 corporate counsel provided the first broad-based picture of conflict resolution processes within large companies. In 2011, a second landmark survey of corporate counsel in Fortune 1,000 companies captured a variety of critical changes in the ways large companies handle conflict. Comparing their responses to those of the mid-1990s, clear and significant evolutionary trends are observable, including a further shift in corporate orientation away from litigation and toward “alternative dispute resolution (ADR),” moderated expectations of ADR; increasing use of mediation, contrasted with a dramatic fall-off in arbitration (except, importantly, consumer and products liability cases); greater control over the selection of third-party neutrals; growing emphasis on proactive approaches such as early neutral evaluation, early case assessment, and integrated systems for managing employment disputes. This article summarizes and analyzes the results of the 2011 Fortune 1,000 survey, compares current data to the 1997 results, and sets both studies against the background of a half-century of evolution. The article concludes with reflections on the future of corporate dispute resolution and conflict management and related research questions.

Full PDF Article

Attachments to this Article

                        author

J. Ryan Lamare

Ryan Lamare is an Assistant Professor of Labor and Employment Relations. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations and held academic positions at the University of Limerick and the University of Manchester prior to joining Pennsylvania State University . Dr. Lamare’s… MORE >

                        author

Tom Stipanowich

Thomas J. Stipanowich is William H. Webster Chair in Dispute Resolution and Professor of Law at Pepperdine University, as well as Academic Director of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution. The Straus Institute was ranked number one among academic dispute resolution programs each of the last seven years by U.S.… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Underwood Family Values – A Template for a Marriage

I’m a late adopter. While the Netflix-produced political drama “House of Cards” premiered back in February of 2013, and four seasons (totaling 52 episodes) have already aired, with a fifth...

By Laurie Israel
Category

A Conversation About Whiteness and Mediation

Indisputably FOI Alyson Carrel (Northwestern) and LCSW Jasmine Atwell (Loyola ‘JD22) recently discussed Sharon Press and Ellen Deason’s new article, “Mediation: Embedded Assumptions of Whiteness?,” published in the Cardozo Journal of...

By Jen Reynolds
Category

Making Peace Our Business

From Bruce Edwards' blog “It took me and my team four days of road travel, mostly off road through deserts and rocks, to reach this border entry point to receive...

By Bruce Edwards

Find a Mediator

X
X
X