I know nothing about the New Minnesota Judicial Code except that it has been recently changed to allow part-time judges to serve as private mediators, effective July 1, 2009. So that means a judge can privately mediate one week and publicly sit on the bench the next.
A dizzying array of issues arise for debate when a sitting, part-time or retired judge takes his or her place at the mediation table, not least being the blurring of the judicial line and self determination at mediation, to say nothing of at-the-table-skills. Some of which are canvassed here at;
1. How wrong can you get?
2. Great on paper, crap at the table
4. It’s the mediators who are connected and have authority in their niche who will live long and prosper
5. Professional Mediator: A Distinction that Makes a Difference (Jeff Kichaven)
6. Judicial Ethics and Judicial Settlement Practices: Time for Two Strangers to Meet (Honorable John C. Cratsley)
“All of this novel settlement activity by judges assigned to try these matters confuses the pubic, undermines the traditional judicial role and, in the end, can lead to coerced settlements…”
From Ann Cerney's blogHow are we supposed to know, 100%, that our marriage, or significant relationship, is secure? The dilemma is, by not believing in our marriage or relationship, we...By Ann Cerney
Historically, college student organizations have been seen as belonging within the mission of colleges and universities (Schmitz, 1997) and particularly within student leadership development (Komives, 1994). More specifically student organizations...By Judy Rashid