Increasing Legalism in International Commercial Arbitration

Disputing Blog by Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, and Holly Hayes

University of Missouri School of Law Professor S. I. Strong has published Increasing Legalism in International Commercial Arbitration: A New Theory of Causes, a New Approach to Cures, 7 World Arbitration and Mediation Review 117 (2013); University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-26. In her paper, Professor Strong discusses several possible explanations for an increased use of legalistic procedures in the realm of international commercial arbitration as well as potential avenues for addressing the phenomenon.

Here is the abstract:

Recent years have seen an increasing amount of criticism of international commercial arbitration, primarily because of concerns about excessive legalism and the attendant increase in the amount of time and money spent on the dispute resolution process. The common assumption is that international commercial arbitration has changed, and not for the better.

Much of the blame has been laid at the feet of U.S.-qualified lawyers who are often assumed to have brought U.S. litigation tactics into the arbitral realm. However, closer analysis suggests that other forces may be at work.

This essay considers some alternative causes of increased legalism in international commercial arbitration. One possibility is that changes to the nature of the underlying transactions have affected the types of disputes that commonly arise. Another hypothesis is that increased legalism may be caused by recent developments in arbitration law, including principles relating to non-signatories, regulatory concerns and choice of law.

After outlining the various options, the essay proposes potential cures for each of the alternatives discussed.


Beth Graham

Beth Graham received a J.D. from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 2004 and a M.A. in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri in 2006. She also holds a B.S. in Public Administration from the University of Nebraska-Omaha. She is licensed to practice law… MORE >

Featured Mediators

View all

Read these next


You’ve Settled? With a Term Sheet? The Devil in the Details

It's 8 p.m. and you've just spent nine straight hours negotiating the settlement of complex commercial litigation with multiple parties that was filed before George Bush first took office.  The...

By Victoria Pynchon

Just How Important is Non-verbal Communication?

For decades, non-verbal communication has been lauded as an important part of establishing connection and understanding with others. Now a new study suggests non-verbals aren’t as key as we think....

By Tammy Lenski

Defining The Ethical Limits Of Acceptable Deception In Mediation

This article was previously published by "Brief", the Journal of the Dupage County Bar Association, Illinois. (11,29)In a recent law review article I authored for the Loyola University of Chicago...

By John Cooley

Find a Mediator