Every day I meet with people and try to sort through their conflicts in order to achieve some
meaningful consensus or agreement. Some of these sessions are more difficult than others, but a
challenging part of the process comes when one party fails to show any appreciation toward the
other party for whatever concession has been given, however modest.
Consider the case of a father afflicted with alcoholism, and the tragedy that denied him the
opportunity to reconcile with his only son.
Tom had just finished his nightly tour of the local pub. His alcoholism had cost him both his
family and his drivers license, so on this night he was walking guardedly down the street hoping
to make it to his apartment in one piece. As he stepped off the curb thinking he had the green
light, a motorist turned right into his path and Tom was instantly killed.
Though Tom didn’t leave many earthly possessions, he did have an 18 year old son, who had had
trouble understanding his father over the years. To say that their communication was challenged
is an understatement.
However, one month before Tom died, he wrote a heart wrenching letter to his son, pleading
forgiveness for a life full of pain. Ironically, before the son could even respond, Tom’s life was
over. That letter was never shown to anyone, not even his lawyer. Tom’s son kept it hidden
away, as if it was a buried treasure, never to be opened again.
Tom’s son brought suit for the wrongful death of his father. The amount of money being offered
by the insurance company became the real sticking point in this case. The insurance company
distrusted the claim for loss of “love, comfort and care,” and their offer reflected that
perspective. After all, the son hadn’t lived with his father for years, and they were hardly on
positive speaking terms. Nevertheless, Tom’s son pressed on with the case, hoping to get some
closure and perhaps a better realization of his father’s plight. It seemed that meaningful
consensus would never come.
Finally, when Tom’s son asked to speak directly to the claims manager. During this
conversation, the son opened the envelope he had received from his father one month before his
death, and handed the letter to the claims manager to read. The son explained to the claims
manager that the memory of his father was meaningful to him, maybe more meaningful than the
paltry money the insurance company was offering. The claims manager read the letter with great
interest. He began to ask the son a few simple questions about his father, such as, “What was he
like when you were a kid?” and “Tell me about your memories.”
Fortunately, the claims manager had a heart. He praised the young man for having the courage to
disclose such a private but important letter to him. He expressed his sympathies for what
happened to his father. He listened carefully to Tom’s son talk about his childhood and the way
his dad was before he became an alcoholic. They discussed ways in which Tom could be
remembered, and came up with several alternatives which the insurer was willing to finance.
Examples included: a plaque on the street corner in honor of Tom; a scholarship; and a donation
to Alcoholic’s Anonymous. They agreed on one of the options along with a few more dollars and
the case settled.
While deal-making in the rough and tumble world of litigation is not always like this case,
people who demonstrate their gratitude toward others before, during and after a mediation
session, end up with a better deal. While this might not square with traditional negotiation
tactics, it is a fundamental truth that I have observed after having mediated over 2,500 cases.
Conversely, I have noticed that parties feel indignant about others who don’t listen or show any
appreciation, no matter how little. This usually results in some type of barrier that prevents a
case from settling.
When these barriers occur, it is generally because someone has an extraordinarily high opinion
of their own abilities and viewpoint and they fail to pay attention to the signals coming in from
the other side. When put in the position of receiving a confession from their opponent during
negotiations, they falter badly. The only response they have is “No” because they lack the skill,
courage and initiative to act. Instead, they only know how to react. In essence, they do not know
how to show gratitude.This idea of gratitude allows individuals to achieve success by creating
more value in every situation and relationship.
In the case of Tom’s death, what appeared to be an insurmountable obstacle–the money–
turned out to be the least of the son’s concerns. The memory of his father could be quantified
after all, and the insurance company could and did make it happen by showing some
understanding, by listening to the story and demonstrating appreciation for the son’s concern.
Show some appreciation next time you come to the table to negotiate. Thank the other side for
their participation, and demonstrate your kindness by having an attitude of gratitude.
The Mediate.com Task Force on Online Mediation Training is pleased to invite you to join colleagues from around the world for our Forum on Standards, Ethics & New Technologies for Online Mediation. Among the featured...By Colin Rule
In light of backlogs resulting from closures due to COVID-19, many courts are turning to presumptive ADR programs. As a result, mediation has become, more than ever, a necessary alternative to...By Rachel Gupta