Fairly Legal

Some mediators I was meeting with this morning expressed trepidation about the new TV series Fairly Legal.  (See my prior post on the announcement of this series over a year ago.)  We were all curious to see it, but worried about such questions as whether mediators in real life can live up to the glamorous image of a TV mediator.  We also wondered whether the show will give people the wrong idea about mediation.  And the question I found most interesting, how will a show about mediation–which aims to reduce and resolve conflict–be able to show the conflict and drama so necessary for television?  Having just watched the premiere, I came away fairly impressed with the way the show dealt with these potential problems.  Not that any mediator’s life could be as hectic and incident-filled as was shown on the show.  Not that the mediation scenes were particularly realistic.  (The closest thing to a real mediation that was shown, strangely enough, was a scene near the beginning where Kate “settles” a robbery, preventing serious injury to both the store owner and the bad guy, by persuading the owner and the robber to agree to allow the robber to take a few items from the store.)  But I was pleased to see that the show made a genuine effort to convey some of the ideas behind mediation, such as the concept of “win-win.”   And despite its lapses in plausibility, and the tendency to resolve each situation with the kinds of tricks and gimmicks that are so common on TV lawyer shows, the show may still serve a useful purpose by introducing a broad audience to the whole idea of mediation, which is still new and unfamiliar to many.

And the dramatic conflict?  Interestingly, the central dramatic conflict seems to lie in the tension between the requirements of the law and the needs of the people involved in the situations the heroine is called upon to solve, a problem I just wrote about last week.  I actually thought the writers did a pretty good job of depicting that conflict, using Kate’s dear departed father and her evil stepmother to symbolize the traditional view of the law, and Kate’s rebellious nature to symbolize a newer approach.  They also show that a mediated solution to problems can provide a better path and perhaps a better result than the results that might be dictated by the legal system.   That means the creators of this show do understand something important about mediation: that it represents a shift from a rules and rights-based approach to the law, to an interest-based approach, and that the clash of these different paradigms presents an opportunity for entertaining drama.

                        author

Joe Markowitz

Joseph C. Markowitz has over 30 years of experience as a business trial lawyer.  He has represented clients ranging from individuals and small businesses to Fortune 500 corporations.  He started practicing with a boutique litigation firm in New York City, then was a partner in a large international firm both… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Can A Checklist Lead The Adversarial System Into The 21st Century?

Recently, I suggested that surgeon-author Atul Gawande's Checklist Manifesto pointed the way toward a more effective and efficient means of responding to frivolous claims than potentially protracted litigation. Skeletal checklists...

By Victoria Pynchon
Category

Is the Other Side as Bad as We Think?

Institute for the Study of Conflict Transformation by Dan SimonHow can they possibly support ____ for president?! Are they stupid? Have they been brainwashed by the media? Do they actually...

By Dan Simon
Category

The ABC’s Of Conflict Thanks The ADR Blogosphere And Mediate.com

I began to blog on ADR topics in 2006 when I stumbled over local mediator Jeff Krivis’ blog (thanks Jeff!) I’ve often said that the blogosphere is a small Midwestern town...

By Victoria Pynchon

Find a Mediator

X
X
X