Contact is Good

International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution

Intergroup conflicts are prevalent in our society. In organizations, we often see tension between departments, units, workgroups and teams. Although workgroup relations in organizations should be cooperative and allow for positive intergroup contact, they have been found to provide fertile ground for intergroup conflict. Such conflicts have been shown to negatively affect employee well-being because they contribute to bullying and stress. Because conflicts between workgroups may lead to workflow disruptions and negatively affect performance, it is often a main concern for management. As a result, a vast number of studies have explored different ways to reduce the tension resulting from conflicts between workgroups.

In order to find ways to reduce negative attitudes and emotions toward outgroups in organization, a recent study examined the effects of intergroup contact on intergroup prosocial behavior. Prosocial behavior is voluntary behavior intended to benefit another, such as helping, sharing and cooperating. Koschate and scholars investigated prosocial behavior between employees working in different workgroups within the same organization and found that personal contact increased prosocial behavior directed at individual outgroup members, whereas task-oriented contact increased prosocial behavior directed at an outgroup as a whole.

When contact led ingroup members to focus on personal characteristics of individual outgroup members, there was a perception of similarity, which allowed them to empathize with individual outgroup members. On the other hand, task-oriented contact increased knowledge about the outgroup’s skills, roles, and duties which decreased costs of helping (i.e. investing time and resources) and increased rewards for helping (i.e. feeling good about helping, feeling competent and learning by helping others).

These findings offer a valuable insight on how we can manage and even prevent intergroup conflicts in organizations. While personal contact between members of different groups is an effective way to build rapport and trust between individuals, task-oriented contact between groups may be a better strategy to make the boundaries between ingroup and outgroup permeable and promote prosocial behavior directed at the group as a whole.

Koschate, M., Oethinger, S., Kuchenbrandt, D.,& Dick, R.V. (2012). Is an outgroup member in need a friend indeed? Personal and task-oriented contact as predictors of intergroup prosocial behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 717-728.

                        author

Regina Kim

Regina Kim is a doctoral student in Social-Organizational Psychology at Teacher’s College, Columbia University.  She graduated from Smith College with a B.A in Psychology and East Asian Literature and received her master’s degree in Organizational Psychology from Yonsei University, South Korea.  Regina worked as a researcher at institutions like Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Mediation Would Fail In Shylock’s Approach: The Exception Of Construction Revisited

Abstract: Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), aiming to assist disputants in reaching a natural, practical and lasting consensus. Whether an agreement results or not, the parties...

By Chandana Jayalath
Category

Mistakes Made By Mediators –Part One

From the Mediation Matters Blog of Steve Mehta. I have promised several people to try to come up with a list of mistakes that mediators make.  Rather than create one...

By Steve Mehta
Category

The Cost Savings Associated With The Air Force Alternative Dispute Resolution Program

ADR SAVINGS 1. PURPOSE THE United States Congress greatly encouraged federal departments to use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) techniques to resolve various disputes involving the federal government by passing the...

By GSA Office Of Equal Employment Opportunity GSA

Find a Mediator

X
X
X