When conflicts arise between residents in a condo building—and in my near West Chicago suburb this kind of living arrangement now comprises nearly one-fifth of all of the housing—they can set up ways of talking and jointly finding solutions instead of engaging in legal warfare or conducting a long Cold War.
Dwellers in condo buildings are not just tenants who must follow the landlord’s rules. They are owners who have to run their building together, collectively. Perhaps the toughest conflict that comes up is when a resident doesn’t pay the montly fees.
Some of the condo’s board members may not see it’s a conflict, but it is: you want them to pay their monthly assessment and they are effectively choosing not to. You say they have to and your by-laws say they have to, but they’re showing in practice that they don’t have to!
You certainly hope they do: it takes money to keep a building in shape, especially some of the older condo buildings. The money comes from a monthly fee each condo resident pays as well as “special assessments”—extra money each unit owner has to chip in. But in the current economic crisis there are buildings in which one or more owners stop making their monthly condo payments or cannot not come up with the money for the special assessment. The Association’s board of directors has to decide what to do about it. Here are three possible routes:
The problem with the “commence collection” strategy, if pursued by itself, is its cost in terms of financial risk and human relationships. If it facilitates a foreclosure, everybody will lose, even though the resulting paper trail may make it possible for the Association to eventually get paid the back assessments owed.
In some states the Association can also get a judge to allow it to actually evict the non-paying neighbor! But to rent out or even purchase the unit is a lot of work, responsibility, and risk for an association. Plus, it’s harsh and distasteful to force a “delinquent” unit owner out of house and home and can cause more tension and conflict among those remaining.
Certainly the condo association can consult with its attorney and be clear on all legal options. A letter from the attorney is not a bad idea: the Association needs to protect itself and in fact is legally required to intervene to obtain compliance. But somebody needs to be communicating directly with the non-complying resident! Probably not the Association’s attorney, but a board member, another resident, the property manager if the Association has one, or a professional mediator needs to be facilitating a conversation that connects the parties and seeks solutions.
Condo boards and condo residents can find new, more peaceful and more effective ways of defending the association’s collective interest. When condo officers and residents are talking without blame or fear, they often find solutions that nobody would have dreamed of if they had stuck exclusively to legal action and collection. As California-based mediator David Stein has said, “a condo is after all a community. Like a community, it can come together to explore possible ways to deal with community problems.”
The award winning Tinker Air Force Base ADR Program shares its lessons in developing and implementing an ADR program: a. Facilitative mediation is extremely important in maintaining the appearance and...By The Tinker Air Force Base Tinker
Len Riskin describes how mediation has integrated within legal practice: it has sparked collaborative law, a promising enterprise, but it also led to court-based mediations, which he believes are legalistic...By Leonard Riskin
From the Small Claims Courts blog of Leo Hura. Many of us will love it when we mediate multimillion dollar high profile mediation cases. To get there we need to...By Leo Hura