Check That Impulse! Be A Dispassionate Mediator

Confession is good for the soul, they say, so here goes mine. . .


I recently conducted a mediation involving injuries to a teenager. The case settled, so my conscience should be clear. However, during the process I fell into the trap of letting impulse overrule reason. I never received a complaint, and both sides left the proceeding happy (or at least equally unhappy, as mediators are prone to predict) but my conscience told me afterward I had slipped, with the best of intentions, but slipped nonetheless.


The young lady had a not very visible scar on her upper lip, purportedly caused by an auto accident, liability for which was attributed to the insured defendant. Fairly routine case, as auto accident cases go.


During opening statements, plaintiff’s counsel presented a persuasive and well reasoned argument in his client’s behalf, emphasizing in particular the serious and permanent nature of the scar on her upper lip. He described the scar as “ugly.” When he did, I instinctively looked at her. Mary [not her real name] was a very attractive young lady, 16-years old, and I wondered what her silent reaction was to his reference to this lifetime defect to her beauty.


It was during the first caucus with plaintiff and her counsel that I expressed the inappropriate comment, stemming from a purely emotional response to the attorney’s characterization of her injury:


“Mary, I have to tell you you are pretty enough not to have to worry about your social life with that scar. I can barely notice it.”


Oops!


Now, Mary’s counsel may well have prepared her, for purposes of her claim, for some hyperbole in his description of the scar, but I did not think about that at the moment. In the eyes of her attorney, and possibly to her mother who was present, it probably seemed this mediator had diminished, at least in his own mind, the value of Mary’s claim, and, perhaps, was not as impartial as he had assured everyone at the outset he would be.


In fact, I was and remained impartial during the duration of the proceeding—the other side certainly never enjoyed the benefit of my comment—but perception, as we well know, can sometimes override reality.


A lesson learned. Mediators can and should empathize, but they must remain dispassionate and check the emotional, albeit natural, impulse.

                        author

Edward P. Ahrens

Ed Ahrens has been a member of the Florida Bar for over 43 years. He is a certified state and federal court mediator in Tampa, Florida. He is also a freelance writer and former president of National Writers Association, South Florida Chapter. He is the author of the popular book,… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Is Collaborative Law Worth the Cost?

Texas Collaborative Law BlogFor people facing divorce, a common question is whether Collaborative cases are "cheaper than litigation". While there is no way to compare a specific Collaborative case to...

By Dick Price
Category

The Mediator’s Log: A Mediation Story – Section 1

The Mediator's Log: A Mediation Story Part One The Day Commences: Engaging the Participants 0845: The mediator arrives at the venue, the office of one of the lawyers. These days,...

By John Sturrock
Category

Federal Court Orders Arbitration of Claims in BP Oil Spill Case

Disputing Blog by Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, and Holly Hayes As readers may already know, litigation surrounding the “Deep Water Horizon” oil spill is well underway. In a later twist,...

By Victoria VanBuren

Find a Mediator

X
X
X