Although a California Court may properly sanction a non-party insurance carrier who possesses the authority to settle litigation for its failure to participate in a mandatory settlement conference, there is no statutory (nor inherent) authority given the Court to sanction the carrier or a party for its purported failure to negotiate in “good faith.” As the Court in Vidrio v. Hernandez (2d DCA) explained today:
In sum, even were we to agree with the trial court’s assessment of the conduct of counsel and the [insurance] adjuster, the failure to increase a settlement offer or to otherwise participate meaningfully in settlement negotiations violates no rule of court and is not a proper basis for an award of sanctions.11 (See, e.g., Triplett v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1415, 1424 [“[w]e eschew any notion that a court may effectively force an unwilling party to settle by raising the specter of a post hoc determination that failure to do so will be evidence of failure to participate in good faith”]; Sigala v. Anaheim City School Dist., supra, 15 Cal.App.4th at p. 669 [“„[a] court may not compel a litigant to settle a case, but it may direct him to engage personally in settlement negotiations, provided the conditions for such negotiations are otherwise reasonableâ€Ÿ”].) [Defendant] filed an appropriate settlement conference statement; her lawyer and Mercury [the insurance carrier] attended the conference and participated in it. While the trial courtâ€Ÿs frustration at the partiesâ€Ÿ lack of movement is understandable, no more was required.
Mediators know all too well that their clients can take positional stances that are hostile and effectively block the creative thinking necessary to reach an equitable settlement. Positional stances taken...By Ellen Kandell, Gloria Vanderhorst
No es suficiente hablar sobre la paz; uno debe creer en ella. Y no es suficiente creer en ella, uno debe trabajar por ella. Eleanor Roosevelt Ha muerto un líder...By Rene Llapur
Jeff Krivis describes how arbitration came about, its success, and then its lack of success as more rules came about. Krivis sees mediation heading in that direction, which he's concerned...By Jeffrey Krivis