Bregant, Robbenolt, and Winship – Perceptions on Settlement

We don’t post a lot of scholarship updates here as there are many better outlets for that, but once and a while something comes out that catches our attention – such as this.  Excellent empiricists Jessica Bregant (Houston), Jennifer Robbennolt (Illinois), and Verity Winship (Illinois) have a very interesting paper up on SSRN titled Perceptions on Settlement that concludes (among other things) that “lay people attribute responsibility to settling defendants.”  Here’s the abstract:

Most legal disputes end in settlement, but little is known about how people perceive settlement. Do people view settling defendants as responsible for the alleged conduct? Do they see settlement more neutrally, as a convenient resolution that avoids a costly trial? This article uses survey and experimental methods to begin answering these questions and to set the agenda for studying an important and mostly neglected area of inquiry: public perceptions of settlement. Survey participants report in their own words their inferences about parties’ reasons for settling legal disputes in a variety of contexts: #MeToo, policing, crime, regulatory enforcement, and tort. Participants’ rich responses informed an experimental study of the tort setting that compares perceptions of settlement with perceptions of other case outcomes such as a jury verdict or the filing of a legal case. Despite common models of settlement as a cost-benefit analysis not necessarily tied to responsibility, the data suggest that lay people attribute responsibility to settling defendants. The data also highlight factors that influence people’s inferences about settling defendants, including whether the defendant is an individual or entity. Understanding settlement is key to understanding the U.S. legal system, and this empirical work on perceptions of settlement lays a foundation for analyzing the perceived legitimacy of a legal system in which settlement plays such a central role.

Congrats on a great study and paper.

author

Art Hinshaw

Art Hinshaw’s research and teaching interests lie in the field of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), primarily mediation and negotiation. His research bridges ADR theory and practice, and his teaching responsibilities include the Lodestar Mediation Clinic and Negotiation among other ADR courses. Professor Hinshaw is active in the ADR community having… MORE

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Online articles, web sites for mediators and mediation training graduates

I just finished teaching a mediation training program for a group of extraordinary people from a wide range of professional and personal backgrounds. It was a delight to work with...

By Diane J. Levin
Category

Regulations and Standards for Online Dispute Resolution: A Primer for Policymakers and Stakeholders (End Notes)

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 NOTES 1. The description of the online dispute resolution processes is beyond the scope of this article, and has been addressed by the author...

By Alan Wiener
Category

Tammy Lenski Is On The Move

Dr Tammy Lenski announces that her blog at Lenski.com will be no more. In its place is a new site and a new direction, for both her writing and her...

By Geoff Sharp

Find a Mediator

X
X
X