Stay up to date on everything mediation!

Subscribe to our free newsletter,
"This Week in Mediation"

Sign Up Now

Already subscribed No subscription today
<xTITLE>A Future of Social Technology In Support of Peace & Justice</xTITLE>

A Future of Social Technology In Support of Peace & Justice

by Colin Rule
December 2014 Colin Rule
I remember attending the 1993 Academy of Family Mediators conference in Washington, DC and showing off ConflictNet (an early online resource for the conflict resolution field, and the precursor to Mediate.com) to whichever mediators were foolish enough to make eye contact with me in the exhibit area. I would connect over the dial-up modem, enter my password, and navigate the menus to show them the discussion areas, resource guides, and member lists. I even remember explaining “e-mail” to them: it’s like postal mail, but it goes over the computer instead of through the USPS. Now mediators are, as a rule, very nice people, but the body language I got was pretty unmistakable: dream on, you nerd. This will never work. It’s too clunky, too inefficient, too dehumanizing, and too… weird.

I also remember showing off early online dispute resolution (ODR) technology to some senior partners at a big law firm in Chicago in the early 2000s. I put our Resolution Room platform up on their computer and they peered at it through their bifocals, trying to figure out what to click on. I explained the benefits of asynchronous interaction in conflict resolution, the security of online document management, and the promise of video conferencing. They sighed with exasperation and complained it was all too confusing. You seem like a nice person, but this will never work. The law is deliberately designed to not be swayed by fads like this. They thanked me for my time as they walked me to the elevators.

Well, it’s about to be 2015. And the reality is, a lot of those people are dead. I couldn’t convince them that technology was the future back then, and many of them successfully fought it off for as long as they could. But they are now pushing up daisies, and the generation below them has now taken the reins. And this generation doesn’t need convincing. 2003 brought Skype. 2004 brought Facebook. 2006, Twitter. In 2007 we got the iPhone. Android launched in 2008. Now I meet retired Federal judges (and three year olds) who love their iPads, and who wouldn’t give them up for anything. If you want evidence, walk from the back of the airplane to the front and see how many people are looking at their personal screens. Look around while you’re on the subway and see how many people are on their phones or Kindles. The genie is out of the bottle, and it’s not going back in.

The funny thing is, we’re still at the beginning. As Mark Andreesen has said, software is going to eat the world. In 2000 there were a half billion people on the internet. By 2014 that grew to three billion, and by 2020 that will grow to five billion. In 2014 there are three billion smartphones being used, and by 2020 that will grow to five billion. By 2020 75% of the global population will have regular access to the internet. The new iPhone CPU has 625 times more transistors than a Pentium processor from 1995. On the first weekend of the iPhone launch Apple sold twenty-five times more transistors than were on earth in 1995. Everyone now has a supercomputer in their pockets with them all day, and they upgrade it every year or two without fail. Soon every person in the world, no matter how far out in the jungle or desert they may be, will be able to access the whole of human knowledge with a few swipes of their fingers. We’re getting closer to the singularity, when the intelligence of machines will exceed that of humans. Experts predict it will happen sometime around 2040. Which is just 25 years away.

This is going to have a massive impact on humans, and human society. And by extension, it will have a massive impact on how we fight, and how we resolve those fights. We can’t keep doing things the way we’ve been doing them and expect that to work in a world that is changing so radically. We must take all the lessons we’ve learned over the past six decades of dispute resolution practice and integrate them into a vision for the future. People are just as complicated when they communicate over technology as they are when they communicate face-to-face. We can’t think that the challenges of the future are so new that we can’t learn from the past.

We have to learn to leverage the growing power of technology to make peace and build understanding, instead of letting it drive misinformation and conflict. Every decision made in developing online environments needs to think about the impact on the humans that interact within those environments. It’s not enough for us to sit on the sidelines saying, call us if you have a conflict. We need to take our wisdom and experience and play a formative role in building these systems. We need to embrace the power of the tools technology is offering us, and learn to leverage their benefits and mitigate their challenges.

I can easily envision a world a decade out where we reserve face-to-face interaction only for our most intimate friends and family members. The bulk of our professional and public lives will take place online. The idea of driving down to the doctor’s office or to the courthouse will seem as antiquated as getting your water from a well. Along with electricity and water, access to the internet will be a new utility – a new human right, even. Our identities will be seamlessly online and offline, and navigating from one to the other will be entirely normal. Boring, even. The next generation will take HD videoconferencing for granted in much the way we take telephones for granted. I can also envision a world where our social technology is designed in a way that builds human empathy, identifies and resolves conflict early and effectively, and introduces an era of greater peace, justice, and happiness. It will take a lot of work to get there, and there will be a lot of bumps in the road, but I can see it plain as day. That’s my hope for the future of mediation.

Biography


Colin Rule is Vice President for Online Dispute Resolution at Tyler Technologies. Tyler acquired Modria.com, an ODR provider Colin co-founded, in 2017. From 2003 to 2011 Colin was Director of Online Dispute Resolution for eBay and PayPal. He has worked in the dispute resolution field for more than 25 years as a mediator, trainer, and consultant. He is currently Co-Chair of the Advisory Board of the National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution at UMass-Amherst and a Non-Resident Fellow at the Gould Center for Conflict Resolution at Stanford Law School.

Colin co-founded Online Resolution, one of the first online dispute resolution (ODR) providers, in 1999 and served as its CEO (2000) and President. In 2002 Colin co-founded the Online Public Disputes Project (now eDeliberation.com) which applies ODR to multiparty, public disputes. Previously, Colin was General Manager of Mediate.com, the largest online resource for the dispute resolution field. Colin also worked for several years with the National Institute for Dispute Resolution (now ACR) in Washington, D.C. and the Consensus Building Institute in Cambridge, MA.

Colin has presented and trained throughout Europe and North America for organizations including the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, the Department of State, the International Chamber of Commerce, and the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution. He has also lectured and taught at UMass-Amherst, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Pepperdine, Southern Methodist University, and Santa Clara University.

Colin is the author of Online Dispute Resolution for Business, published by Jossey-Bass in September 2002, and The New Handshake: Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of Consumer Protection, published by the ABA in 2017. He has contributed more than 50 articles to prestigious ADR publications such as Consensus, The Fourth R, ACResolution Magazine, and Peace Review. He serves on the boards of the Consensus Building Institute and the PeaceTech Lab at the United States Institute of Peace. He holds a Master’s degree from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government in conflict resolution and technology, a graduate certificate in dispute resolution from UMass-Boston, a B.A. from Haverford College, and he served as a Peace Corps volunteer in Eritrea from 1995-1997.



Email Author
Author Website

Additional articles by Colin Rule

Comments