Stay up to date on everything mediation!

Subscribe to our free newsletter,
"This Week in Mediation"

Sign Up Now

Already subscribed No subscription today
<xTITLE>The Growing Role of ADR in Multidistrict Litigation</xTITLE>

The Growing Role of ADR in Multidistrict Litigation

by Chris Poole
January 2013

JAMS ADR Blog by Chris Poole

Chris Poole

The U.S. District Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) hears the most complex federal multidistrict cases. In 2011 alone, it handled more than 43,750 cases and considered motions for centralization in no fewer than 400,000 matters. Established in 1968, the MDL Panel determines whether related civil cases pending in different federal courts should be transferred to one district court for coordinated and consolidated pre-trial proceedings. The result is a more efficient handling of pre-trial processes that eases the burden on crowded federal dockets.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is playing an ever-increasing role in assisting the MDL Panel. Many cases routinely settle while in process at the MDL Panel stage, with parties engaging arbitrators or mediators. But ADR is proving useful in many other situations. ADR providers are assisting MDL judges not only in settlement discussions, but also in pre-trial proceedings. This occurred, for example, with the Toyota unintended acceleration case, in which several retired judges have assisted in discovery and related issues.

There is also a case to be made for an even bigger role for ADR in helping to streamline MDL cases. Settlement conferences, for example, could be useful in resolving disputes unique to some of the individual cases transferred to the MDL Panel while it handles the larger common issues. This would free up the other federal courts where these individual matters may have stalled.

ADR processes can also run in parallel with proceedings at the MDL Panel level. Parties in complex cases often create a national settlement team with the sole job of resolving the litigation. That team usually includes an experienced lead counsel whose only focus is settling the case. The settlement team works closely with both trial and in-house counsel to learn the case and develop strategies for settling the case. The process can be especially useful in focusing discovery, which is often the most expensive aspect of litigation.

It is likely that MDL matters will only increase in numbers, and ADR processes such as mediation can and should play a central role in streamlining and resolving these complex cases.


The JAMS ADR blog serves to engage our clients, the legal community and the public in a discussion about alternative dispute resolution. As leaders and experts in mediation, arbitration and more, it’s our duty to remain at the forefront of legal developments, trends and news in areas of law that pertain to ADR. 

Everything we say reflects the highest ethical and moral standards. We are dedicated to neutrality, integrity and honesty in all of our interactions. Welcome to the JAMS ADR blog. We hope you find it informative, interesting and we hope you come visit again soon.

Email Author
Author Website

Additional articles by Chris Poole