Last week, I discussed a legislative bill, AB 2475, introduced into the California legislature which, if passed, abolishes quasi-judicial immunity for mediators and other alternative dispute resolution professionals.(ab_2475_bill_20100408.) As President of the Southern California Mediation Association (“SCMA”), I sent a letter to the sponsor of the legislation, posted it on my blog and urged everyone to make their voices heard.
It seems those voices were heard as the legislation was amended on April 22, 2010 to abolish quasi-judicial immunity only for matters falling within California’s Family Code. (ab_2475_bill_20100422 .) Thus, while this legislation no longer effects mediators handling civil, commercial, contractual or personal injury disputes, it still effects private mediators handling family-law matters. Given that its purpose is apparently aimed at evaluators (i.e. not mediators) who submit findings and recommendations to a court, this latest amended draft still sweeps too broadly: Family law mediators are bound by mediation confidentiality and so do not submit any findings and recommendations to a court.
So, once again, I have written to the sponsor of the legislation ( letter) and urge each of you to do the same and make your viewpoint known and heard.
. . . Just something to think about.
Postscript: It seems that this draft legislation has once again been amended. On April 28, 2010, it was modified drastically so that it now abolishes”… quasi -judicial immunity… [for] any private third party … appointed by the court …who provides a report or findings to the court in a proceeding under the Family Code, with the intention that the court act in one way or another based on the report or findings….” (ab_2475_bill_20100428.) Success! The Assembly Member heard your voices! Have a great day!