Stay up to date on everything mediation!

Subscribe to our free newsletter,
"This Week in Mediation"

Sign Up Now

Already subscribed No subscription today
<xTITLE>Supreme Court Approves Drafting Role for Lawyer Mediators</xTITLE>

Supreme Court Approves Drafting Role for Lawyer Mediators

by Michael Dwyer, Susan Hansen
February 2017

On January 12, 2017, the Wisconsin Supreme Court approved Rule Petition 16-04 that expanded the role of lawyer mediators in family law cases.  The rule permits a lawyer mediator who assists parties in reaching agreements in a case arising under the Family Code to draft, select, complete, modify and file the legal documents required to implement agreements reached in mediation.  The effective date will be set forth when the Court issues the formal order. 

Previously, lawyer mediators could not draft legal documents such as Marital Settlement Agreements and Judgments which meant that parties had to use checkbox forms, hire individual lawyers or, most frequently, do their legal drafting and filing themselves.  The new rule authorizes neutral drafting, with informed written consent, and states the ethical rules of competence and diligence apply to such lawyer mediators. 

The rule specifies the minimum requirements for informed consent which include an explanation of the lawyer’s limited role, that the lawyer does not represent either party and cannot give legal advice to the parties, and the desirability of each party seeking independent legal advice. The rule permits the lawyer-mediator to file the documents on behalf of the parties but not appear in court.  It requires the attorney to disclose that the document was drafted with the assistance of a lawyer acting as a mediator.

The impetus for the rule was the need to adapt the practice of family law to address the dramatic increase in the number of parties who navigate the family court system without legal assistance. Given that an estimated 70% of all couples attempt to navigate their divorce without any legal assistance, mediation is an efficient and cost effective alternative. The new rule allows parties to get the full value of a lawyer-mediator’s expertise by authorizing the lawyer to neutrally draft all legal documents needed on behalf of both parties.   It is a significant advance in supporting the changing role of lawyers as neutral or limited scope problem-solvers, not just adversarial advocates.

Because mediation is not an adversarial two-lawyer process, parties who currently avoid lawyers for fear of escalating conflict or losing control of their case, will be more willing to seek legal assistance from a lawyer mediator in resolution of their disputes.  Having the lawyer mediator draft all legal documents neutrally for both parties helps assure their joint decisions are well-informed and properly written for the court and all necessary implementation steps are taken.  This will reduce conflict and post-judgment litigation that arises from ill-informed decisions or poorly drafted documents. 

The new rule is a trend-setting response to the evolution of family law.  Wisconsin has taken a step that few other states have done.  It is a positive step forward for the public, the legal profession, and the courts.


Michael Dwyer

Michael J. Dwyer is a Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge. Prior to being elected, he was a general practitioner in Milwaukee County for over 20 years. He was first elected in 1997 and is in his third rotation in the Family Division, where he is currently the Presiding Judge. Judge Dwyer was a co-founder of the Wisconsin Chapter of AFCC.

Judge Dwyer is chair of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Planning and Policy Advisory Committee’s Limited Scope Representation - Mediation Subcommittee. That subcommittee proposed Rule 16-04 to allow lawyer mediators to draft legal documents in family law matters.

Susan Hansen practices family law, with an emphasis on collaborative divorce and mediation.
She has practiced in the southeastern Wisconsin area for over 30 years. She has extensiveexperience in complex financial and child-related family law cases.  She practices  a client-centered, problem-solving approach to family law issues and supports working in an interdisciplinary process to provide the greatest value and long-term benefits to clients.

Susan is the Past President of the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP) and Past Chair of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Wisconsin. She has served as a member of the Guardian ad Litem Legislative Council Committee, the Wisconsin Bar Association Family Law Section Board of Directors and Training and Public Education Chair for the Collaborative Family Law Council of Wisconsin.