Amazon Asks Federal Court to Compel Arbitration in Alexa Children’s Privacy Lawsuit

Disputing Blog by Karl Bayer, Victoria VanBuren, and Holly Hayes

Retail giant Amazon has reportedly asked a Washington federal court to send a proposed class action lawsuit that was brought against the company in June to arbitration.  In the case, a group of parents filed a putative collective action complaint against Amazon in the Western District of Washington in Seattle over the company’s Alexa technology.  The parents claim the merchant violated the law in several states when Alexa-enabled devices recorded their children speaking in their homes without first obtaining consent.

In their complaint, the parents assert:

Alexa routinely records and voiceprints millions of children without their consent or the consent of their parents. This practice violates the laws of Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington, which prohibit the recording of oral communications without the consent of all parties to the communication. These laws recognize the unique privacy interest implicated by the recording of someone’s voice. That privacy interest is all the more powerful in light of modern voice printing technology and the potentially invasive uses of big data by a company the size of Amazon. It takes no great leap of imagination to be concerned that Amazon is developing voiceprints for millions of children that could allow the company (and potentially governments) to track a child’s use of Alexa-enabled devices in multiple locations and match those uses with a vast level of detail about the child’s life, ranging from private questions they have asked Alexa to the products they have used in their home.

According to Amazon, however, the parents agreed to settle any disputes with the company through arbitration when they activated and began using Alexa-enabled devices.  Amazon’s motion to compel arbitration reportedly claims, “The plaintiffs’ parents in this suit, who signed up for and then permitted their children to use Amazon’s Alexa service on devices in their homes cannot avoid arbitrating their claims by suing in the names of those children.

Please check back soon for future developments in this interesting case!

                        author

Beth Graham

Beth Graham received a J.D. from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 2004 and a M.A. in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri in 2006. She also holds a B.S. in Public Administration from the University of Nebraska-Omaha. She is licensed to practice law… MORE >

Featured Mediators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Online Mediation Training at Mediate University

One of Mediate.com’s most popular features over the last decade has been Mediate University.  From its launch with just a few courses in (2010), Mediate University has grown to a...

By Colin Rule
Category

What Oprah Taught Me

There’s been a lot of Oprah talk over the past few weeks as her daytime talk show wraps up after 25 years on the air. Like a lot of people...

By Vivian Scott
Category

The <I>Pro Bono</I> Problem

Charles Parselle's recent mediate.com article, L.A.’s Policy Of Free Mediation Benefits Everybody But Mediator has generated considerable comment in the BLAWG- and BLARG-O-SPHERE. As mediator Parselle points out, the Los...

By Victoria Pynchon

Find a Mediator

X
X
X