So one measure of assessment in a grievance or disciplinary investigation is whether the behaviour fell below the standards of the ‘ordinary reasonable person’ in the same situation – the famous ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’. After the shocking referendum result, has the definition of that ‘reasonable’ behaviour changed?
While there was racism in the UK prior to Brexit, the tone of the Leave campaign gave it a perceived legitimacy, which is now visible across England.
So who is going to represent the ‘reasonable’ man? Clearly a percentage of the British public – who are all more than capable of sitting on the said Omnibus and who each believes they are ‘reasonable’ – believe in racism, bigotry and discrimination, and would take the view that racist abuse at work as perfectly acceptable.
We need clarification from the likes of the CIPD, ACAS and the Government. But in the meantime, CMP is going to continue to investigate racist allegations with the same impartiality, and applying the same (old?) standards of ‘reasonableness’, to do our bit to contribute to a non-racist, non-discriminatory Britain.
International Center for Cooperation and Conflict ResolutionAre female negotiators penalized for asserting too much? Our experiences and past research seem to indicate yes. However, for women to be perceived as...
By Regina KimComputer screens buzzing with distraction. Background noise. Fidgeting with camera angles. Bad lighting, echos and muffled voices. Now add strangers in the background, waiting rooms, unreliable internet connections. Mediators, hold...
By Kathleen YoungFrom Colin Rule's blog. Bono in the NYT today: "The Nobel Peace Prize is the rest of the world saying, “Don’t blow it.” But that’s not just directed at Mr....
By Colin Rule