For those disputants who have found that there is no pertinent binding or legal remedy to their problems or where direct negotiations have failed when a party wants to punish another, they may feel that they are at an impasse with no direction. Some parties may even desire to send a message to the public, an industry or individual. Where a legal injunction is required to prevent an ongoing or future harm, they may want to seek something quicker than litigation, thereby decreasing pressure on the both parties. They can have options. They can choose the system that suits their needs; after all, it’s about the disputants, not the mediator. The results rest in their hands. The outcome is the one that they will have to live with. It’s their call. After all, they seek dispute resolution for results not an impasse. Below, you have a choice to choose your desired outcome according to your standards you seek.
ADR System | Voluntary | Intake | Confidentiality | A process of Empowerment | Self-Determination | Impartiality | Witnesses allowed |
Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Co-Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Arbitration | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Peer Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Conciliation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Negotiation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Med-Arb | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Facilitation | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Ombudsman | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
ADR System | Caucus | PositionInterestsNeeds | Participants decide the final outcome | The Agreement is binding | Outcome decided by the neutral | Abuse/criminal activity allowed | An ongoing relationship exists between the parties |
Mediation | X | X | X | X | |||
Co-Mediation | X | X | X | X | |||
Arbitration | X | X | X | X | |||
Peer Mediation | X | X | X | X | |||
Conciliation | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Negotiation | X | X | X | X | |||
Med-Arb | X | X | yes and then no | X | X | ||
Facilitation | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Ombudsman | X | X | X | X |
ADR System | Expedient Resolution of the outcome | Privacy from Public/ media scrutiny | Atimely resolution is a factor | Multiple parties may be involved | A lawyer is essential | Assists in generating options/agreements | Costs |
Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | Low to high | |
Co-Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | Medium to high | |
Arbitration | X | X | X | X | X | X | Medium to high |
Peer Mediation | X | X | X | X | X | Low | |
Conciliation | X | X | X | X | X | Low to high | |
Negotiation | X | X | X | X | X | X | Medium to high |
Med-Arb | X | X | X | X | X | X | Low to high |
Facilitation | X | X | X | X | X | Medium to high | |
Ombudsman | X | X | X | X | X | X | Low |
When someone is emotionally swamped by anger, it can be helpful to redirect them temporarily away from their feelings and engage their cognitive capacities. The following invitation helps de-escalate anger...
By Tammy LenskiRecently in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v White, 548 U.S. ___, No. 05-259 (June 22, 2006), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a more relaxed standard was...
By Michael EisnerThe year's must-read California Litigation Journal article is Justice Ignazio Ruvolo's "It's Time to Re-examine the State of Civil Litigation in California." You have to be a member to read the issue...
By Victoria Pynchon