![]() |
| ALL SECTIONS | ABOUT MEDIATION | Civil | Commercial | Community | Elder | Family/DIVORCE | Public Policy | Workplace |
|
Find Mediator by Practice Area:
Adult Family
Business Civil Commercial Construction Divorce Elder Issues Employment Family Personal Injury Probate Public Policy Real Estate Workplace ..more Find International Mediators:
Find Mediator by State:
Alabama
Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Find Mediator by City:
Albuquerque
Arlington Atlanta Austin Baltimore Boston Charlotte Chicago Cleveland Colorado Springs Columbus Dallas Denver Detroit El Paso Fort Worth Fresno Houston Indianapolis Jacksonville Kansas City Las Vegas Long Beach Louisville Los Angeles Memphis Mesa Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis Nashville New York City Oakland Oklahoma City Omaha Philadelphia Phoenix Portland Raleigh Sacramento San Antonio San Diego San Francisco San Jose Seattle Tucson Tulsa Virginia Beach Washington D.C. Wichita ...more |
|
||||||||||
|
|||
|
FEATURED MEDIATORS
![]() 5/24: When does an arbitration agreement extend to third parties? read 5/24: Brokerage Firm Goes All In But Loses High Stakes Employment Arbitration Poker Game read 5/24: NY Times: The Advantages of Arbitration read 5/24: Dow Announces $2.16 Billion Award in K-Dow Arbitration read 5/24: Mediate democracy? read 5/22: Arbitration ends long tempest in a tea can read 5/22: Former Merrill Lynch Colleagues Sue Each Other In FINRA Arbitration read 5/22: Arbitrator dismisses cap-fine appeal by Cowboys, Redskins read 5/22: Bureau may seek mediation to advance Lake Berryessa resorts read 5/22: Best screwed up headline ever: "Miley Cyrus advises young girls to mediate" read read all ![]()
"We do have a website with you (mediate.com/win-win), and have been very happy with the results. We have gotten activity, and several cases have emerged from it. It is a fine service."
Nancy More Testimonials Marketplace Featured Listings
![]()
If at first you don't succeed, try, try, again. Then quit. There's no use being a damn fool about it.
W.C. Fields |


Legislation has been introduced in California to provide a narrow exception to the state’s strict mediation confidentiality statute so that clients may use communications with their own attorneys during mediation if needed to assert claims of professional negligence or misconduct against their counsel in later proceedings. This legislation follows the January 2011 decision by the California Supreme Court in Cassel v. Superior Court, which rejected the Court of Appeal’s creation of a judicial exception to the confidentiality statute, and prevented a party from using his private communications with his attorneys before and during a mediation in a later action for legal malpractice. The Court relied on the plain language of the statue and stated that any exception must come from the legislature.
California Assembly Bill No. 2025 (February 23, 2012)











The number of medical malpractice lawsuits filed in Pennsylvania declined for the sixth year in a row, with attorneys attributing the decrease to private mediation, among other changes. The current number of med mal lawsuits is now only about half the peak in 2002.
Beaumont Enterprise.com (May 22, 2011)




Continuing its strict interpretation of California’s broad mediation confidentiality statute, the California Supreme Court rejected the appellate court’s creation of a judicial exception, and prevented a party from using his private communications with his attorneys before and during a mediation in a later action for legal malpractice. The alleged malpractice involved claims that the party’s counsel had conflicts of interest and coerced him to settle for too little. Although private conversations during the mediation between the party and his attorneys did not involve the mediator or other party (or reveal anything said or done in mediation discussions with the mediator or other party), the Court relied on the plain language of the statue to conclude they were confidential nonetheless and that any exception must come from the legislature. The confidentiality statute only applies to civil actions, however, so would not protect an attorney from use of mediation-related oral communications in a criminal prosecution for fraud.
Cassel v. Superior Court, No. S178914 (Cal., January 13, 2011).


