On Beating Bullies


by Michael Jacobs

May 2012

Michael  Jacobs

I did some work recently for a large government department who’ve instituted a 'zero-tolerance' policy in regards bullying and discrimination. Their intentions are commendable.

Intention is one thing, enforcement another. There is a strong feeling in the organisation that any identified bully should be hung, drawn and quartered. Ideally, the perpetrator would be amongst the ranks of senior management, so as to demonstrate the absolute seriousness of the policy.

The belief is that naming and shaming will curtail behaviour. The risk is that we move beyond policy to something more like a witch-hunt. Bullies are bad. All bullies should be found and punished. And before you know it, we’ve launched a moral crusade.

I want to be clear: bullying, as a form of behaviour, is wrong. This isn't in question. What is less clear is where we draw the line. In a context where people are under enormous pressure to perform, with tighter deadlines and less resources, I suspect that many of us might feel like dispensing with niceties and just tell people what to do. In short, to bully them into getting the work done.

I’m not convinced that this is a situation best remedied by vindictiveness. Organisations need to abandon witch-hunts in favour of a something more akin to an Alcoholics Anonymous approach.. The ideal then isn't for some senior executive to lose their head. Rather, they’d stand and publicly declare "My name is X, and I'm under such extreme stress that I feel like bullying my staff every single day". In the face of increasing demands, wanting to kick someone’s butt to get stuff done is neither incomprehensible nor evil. It's simply normal.

By demonising the behaviour, there’s every chance that we drive it underground..People will get better at disguising it. Bullying will evolve into more subtle forms of coercion and manipulation. And with every new variation, the possibility of change grows more remote.

What we need to get across is that while the urge towards compelling others may be understandable, it’s not a necessity. There are ways other than bullying that can get things done – without destroying trust, respect and relationships in the process. Some people will undoubtedly need help in learning alternative management techniques. In which case what they need isn’t to be punished, but mentored, coached and educated.

Ultimately, if someone is courageous enough to stand up and own up, then beating them up just feels cruel and wasteful.  Zero-tolerance is a worthy ideal. No one should have to suffer bullying in the workplace. And paradoxically, it may actually be tolerance -- insofar as we recognise and acknowledge in ourselves the desire to bully -- that offers us the best chance of helping people to do otherwise.

to top of page

Biography




Michael Jacobs has been a practicing mediator for nearly sixteen years. He loves what he does and wishes he had the humility to refer to himself as a peacemaker. Currently he trains mediators in both family and workplace mediation. He lives just outside of Hereford in the UK.



Email Author
Additional articles by Michael Jacobs



Comments



Free subscription to comments on this article Add Brief Comment

-- --
 Sharon Durgin-Campbell,   Rutland VT  mediator@comcast.net      05/19/12 
 Relational Aggression? 
--
-- -- --
Thanks for the thoughtful article on bullying. As conflict professionals, we should help organizations consider bullying as a symptom of a dysfunctional system rather than isolated events. I work with elder public housing sites to change the overall culture so that there is no room for bullying in the system. I have also found that focusing on the behavior itself is counter productive and often makes it worse. By encouraging bystander engagement, making expectations of respect clear and exploring how threats to self-identity exacerbate the problem is more effective than punishment.
-- -- --
--
Add New Comment
--
--
--

-- --
 Alan ,   London    05/15/12 
 Bullying the bullies? 
--
-- -- --
I agree that the demonisation approach to bullies is ineffectual, and not a little hypocritical. It suggests 'I'd bully too if I had the power' when condemnations and vindictiveness are the responses. If you point the finger at someone there are always 3 pointing back. What is an additional obstacle to simply identifying a bully is that there is often a lack of clarity about whether bullying has occurred or not. Many in a group where a bully is thought to be a member do not see their behaviour as bullying...it's not always that they are 'too afraid to say anything' they just aren't as affected by it. What needs to be learned is how such people are able to respond to behaviours others see as 'bullying' in ways that mean they don't feel bullied. Simply to focus on demonisation of the bully is hypocritical and moves nothing forward.
-- -- --
--
Add New Comment
--
--
--

-- --
 Lorraine Segal,   Santa Rosa CA  lorraine@conflictremedy.com      05/15/12 
 Reject bullying behavior, not the bully 
--
-- -- --
Thanks for the great article on bullying. I've been doing presentations recently about school bullying, and I always include compassion as well as consequences for the bullies. I agree absolutely that it is easier to point fingers at others than to recognize that we are all flawed human beings, capable of kindness and meanness. But that recognition is essential to address bullying in a full way.
-- -- --
--
Add New Comment
--
--
--

The views expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc., Mediate.com or of reviewing editors.




Follow Mediate.com on Twitter

Copyright 1996-2013 © Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.