Gender and Culture Communication Differences


by Gregorio Billikopf

September 2012

Gregorio Billikopf

In my seminars on interpersonal negotiation skills, communication, conflict management and mediation skills, we often speak about cultural and gender differences. Do Hispanics really make less eye contact than non-Hispanics? Do men or women expect or require more eye contact as a general rule? Do men touch women more than women touch men in casual conversation? Proxemics (personal space), haptics (touch), and kinesics (body and face) are names given for studies in these topics that attempt to answer such questions.

An increased understanding of these issues is important for improving our day to day interactions with others. It would be a mistake to take the results of these research-based studies and stereotype behaviors. It is much better to keep in mind that these sorts of differences exist and be sensitive regarding possible differences, as we deal with others. In an article, Cultural Differences? or Are we really that different? (1999), I made the point that people within any given culture show greater differences than people between cultures.

Mediators may be especially interested in some of these topics. For instance, when parties hold grudges towards each other, increasing eye contact between them may polarize them further. But once individuals permit more humanity in each other, increased eye contact may act to increase positive feelings among the parties (Billikopf, 2009). Similar comments may apply to proxemics (Knapp & Hall, 2010).

In Party-Directed Mediation, for instance, individuals meet alone with the mediator in a pre-caucus. By the time they meet with the other party in the joint session, they are ready for increased eye contact. The seating arrangement promotes this eye contact. In some mediation approaches where pre-caucusing is not used, the parties both face the mediator, until the mediator indicates to them that they should face each other. In both of these cases, the mediators use eye contact effectively.

I will give one additional example of how I use this information. In Party-Directed Mediation, I like to use a long rectangular table. The parties sit across from each other at one end of the table (facing each other), while the mediator sits far away from both, at the far end of the table. The table works to give the individuals a comfortable distance to sit from each other. By sitting so far away from the parties, the mediator also gives a message to the parties: that they are here to talk to each other. Sometimes tables are not available. In these cases I prefer to place the participant chairs a little further away from each other. It is not unusual for the parties to choose to narrow this gap, but this is their decision rather than mine.

 2009 Survey

I put forth a short survey to help answer some questions on proxemics and related matters. Although this was intended as an informal study, after deleting duplicates I ended up with more than 3,800 responses. I collected data for about two years up to mid-2009. Subjects from around the world participated. Most of the questions were Likert-scale type questions (i.e., ranging from completely agree {1} to completely disagree {5}).

While I obtained mostly statistically significant results (Pearson Chi-Square), readers should keep in mind that this study is based on self-reports rather than on observation. Having said this, Knapp & Hall (2010) suggest that self-reports have shown validity.

Results 

Both men and women report a keen awareness of whether they touch others when they speak. Even so, men, in contrast to women, seem to be more cognizant of their touching behavior (p<0.001). Both men and women also report an acute awareness of whether they have been touchedby another when they speak. Men seem slightly more cognizant than women about being touched (p<0.01). Europeans/Caucasians are the most likely to notice they were touched, followed by mixed ethnicity populations and Hispanics. Native populations and Middle Easterners were the least likely to notice they were touched (p<0.001).

Neither men nor women report that women invade their personal space very frequently. Men are a bit less likely (in contrast to women) to feel that a woman has invaded his personal space (p<0.01). Also, neither men nor women report that men invade their personal space very frequently. Men are more likely than women to feel that a man has invaded his personal space (p<0.001), however. Both men and women feel that men invade their personal space more frequently than women do.

At the one extreme, Hispanics (followed by Europeans/Caucasians) are least likely to feel that women invade their personal space. At the other extreme, Middle Easterners (followed by Africans/Blacks) are the most likely to feel women invade their personal space (p<0.01).

Men generally report that women touch them more than they touch women in friendly conversation. Women confirm this observation by stating that they touch men more than men touch them (p<0.001, Figure 1). The literature endorses these results (Knapp & Hall, 2010; Wood, 2011). Studies show that women tend to touch in a more affiliative manner while men tend to use touch as an expression of power (Wood, 2011). 

 

Neither men nor women generally report feeling uncomfortable sitting by awoman when using public transportation or in the movie theater. There is no significant difference, in terms of discomfort, between how men and women feel about sitting by a woman. Yet both men and women report a preference for sitting by a woman (p<0.001). Some respondents wanted to clarify that this difference has nothing to do with the person’s sex, but rather the fact that women tend to occupy less space than men. In contrast, there is more ambiguity of feelings for both men and women about sitting by a man (Figure 2), although men (in contrast to women) generally seem to feel less discomfort about having to sit by other men (p<0.001).

The literature (Knapp & Hall, 2010) notes that: (1) women tend to stand closer to other women when conversing, compared to the distances between men—and that both men and women stand closer to women; (2) taller people stand further away than shorter individuals regardless of sex. I believe this last point should be taken into consideration in carrying out studies regarding ethnic and sex differences in personal space studies. Also, there are specific differences in terms of greetings and good-byes. 

 

Both men and women report making an effort not to touch the man or the woman who is sitting next to them in public transportation or at a public event. Women try harder than men not to touch the person next to them, especially when that person is a man (p<0.001). The same tendency exists when the person next to them is a woman, but not enough to be statistically significant. Respondents were also asked for the reason they avoided touching the person next to them. Being polite was a bit more important to men, while avoiding being uncomfortable was more important to women. A greater number of men did not care if they touched the person next to them compared to the women’s responses to these same questions (p<0.001).

A greater number of women, in contrast to men (Figure 3, where 1 indicates a stronger preference for eye contact), report that they require eye contact when carrying out conversation (p<0.001). This makes sense because women generally tend to use eye contact to build affiliation while men may also use it to exert power (Wood, 2011). From an ethnic perspective, Europeans/Caucasians as well as Hispanics reported the greatest needs for eye contact; and Africans/Blacks and Middle Easterners reported the least need for eye contact during conversation (p<0.001). 

A greater number of men, in contrast to women, report that they notice an invasion of space from someone of a different culture, race or ethnicity (p<0.001). This question was resented by a number of respondents who felt they were being accused of being discriminatory. 

 

A greater number of men, in contrast to women, consider themselves punctual (p<0.001).

Some final thoughts

There are differences between the sexes as well as cultures that are worth studying. Becoming aware of some of the areas in which people differ can help us become more attentive and effective communicators. A number of respondents made the point of explaining that in some behaviors (such as eye contact, touch, etc.) they are not typical of their gender or ethnicity. Turning differences into stereotypes may cause more harm than good. When it comes to effective interpersonal communication it is critical to think about individual differences rather than population differences (see Cultural Differences? 2009).

We can, however, take some steps to notice other people’s preferences and make our own clear. If I need someone’s undivided attention I may want to ask this person for a good time to talk.

One friend mentioned how our cell phones—whether we are checking our e-mails or texting—often make it so we are less than present for others. We can try to reduce distractions that send others the unintended message that we really are not all that interested in listening.

References 

Billikopf, Gregorio (2009). Party-Directed Mediation: Helping Others Resolve Differences (2nd Edition).  URL. Appendix I. Cultural Differences? http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7conflict/

Knapp, Mark L & Hall, Judith A. (2010). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction (7th Edition). Wadsworth.

Wood, Julia (2011). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. Wadsworth. 




to top of page

Biography




Gregorio Billikopf Encina is a Labor Management Farm Advisor with the University of California. His agricultural extension research and teaching efforts have focused on such topics as employee selection, compensation, performance appraisal, discipline and termination, supervision, interpersonal relations, conflict resolution, and negotiation skills.



Email Author
Website: www.cnr.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7conflict/

Additional articles by Gregorio Billikopf

Comments

The views expressed by authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc., Mediate.com or of reviewing editors.




SMU Dispute Resolution Program

Copyright 1996-2014 © Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.