|
WELCOME TO THE COMMERCIAL SECTION
To address the concerns of ADR practitioners who provide ADR services for the resolution of issues arising out of commercial activities. Definition of Commercial Conflicts:Commercial conflict describes conflict which takes place between firms, including certain types of situations when an individual is in business. But it does not include every kind of conflict which takes place in a commercial setting; labor-management conflict, workplace, and employment conflict are often found in commercial environments, but have their own characteristics and resolution procedures.Who can use commercial ADR:Many people find themselves involved in commercial conflicts as interested parties or as bystanders with little control as in a troubled merger of companies, when you happen to work for one of the companies involved. People, who operate small businesses, work as managers of larger ones, or contract with any size of business have more direct roles in commercial conflict and need to understand how these conflicts develop and how they are typically handled.
Anyone who is in a contracting or compliance role in a commercial firm which includes large numbers of people who hold multiple roles because they operate small businesses needs to understand that commercial conflict is virtually inevitable in a dynamic economy. Doing good business depends on being able to make good distinctions between the few conflicts that really demand legal (or arbitration) procedures, and the many that demand clarification or adjustment of relatively minor terms in otherwise acceptable contracts. Example:A quite common example of commercial conflict occurs when a seller of some type of supplies or components used by buyer sends a bad batch. If Buyer has changed any of the specifications recently, including the amount of time allowed to Seller to make and deliver the goods, Seller is likely to believe that the error is really Buyer's fault, or that the fault is shared. Buyer, meanwhile, may have no ready alternative to continuing to do business with Seller, if the supplies are in any way distinctive (including being notably cheaper than other suppliers would charge). Often, the parties will frustrate each other with legal arguments, lessening the likelihood of future business dealings, only to settle the matter just short of trial on a basis in which Seller pays Buyer a certain amount of money as compensation, without either party having really learned anything that will lessen the likelihood of future disputes.
|