Site by:
Resourceful Internet
Solutions, Inc.
|
Mediate.com/MiddleEast
Archived Content:
Middle East
What's New
The Guerrilla vs. The Humanist Negotiator
Robert Benjamin This provocative article discusses and contrasts a hard-edged approach to negotiation with the recalcitrant Iranian administration that is in stark contrast to the more prevalent view of negotiation as a humanistic and rational enterprise. This goes to the heart of how negotiation and mediation are practiced, not just on a geopolitical level, but in all dispute contexts.
Like it or Not, the United States and Iran are Partners: Seven Principles for Moving Forward Negotiations
Bill Lincoln, Robert Benjamin, Polly Davis and Seth Kane
There is a point to be made and not to be forgotten: Conflict adversaries such as the United States and Iran are indeed the partners which each other needs and seeks if they are to prevent, manage and resolve dysfunctional conflict. While the nuclear issue is seemingly the focal point of the conflict, in reality it is the overall US-Iranian relationship that must be addressed if stability and real security is to be achieved in the region.
Keith Seat
Mediation in Israel has developed momentum over the last year, since the Justice Minister approved implementation of a mandatory court-annexed mediation program to begin in March 2008. The pilot program in the magistrate courts of three cities will require parties in civil cases above a certain size to participate in a mediation session prior to going to trial. The court is proceeding carefully with the mandatory program, and is seeking to learn from mediation programs in courts around the world, noting that there are substantial differences in approach between common law jurisdictions (such as the U.S. and U.K.) and civil law jurisdictions (such as Continental Europe).
The Jerusalem Post (December 5, 2007)
Conflict, Mourning And Aesthetics (What Happens When History Does Not Pass?)
Dorit Cypis Aesthetics, the philosophy of questioning the integrity of form, offers brilliant tools for how to see, question, disassemble, reform, reframe, speculate and unknow. Aesthetics thrives on conceptual, formal, structural, perceptual and experiential conflict, needing to undo in order to see anew, displace in order to revise meaning, obscure in order to seduce, rupture in order to reveal the sublime....all this intentionally in the name of change. Aesthetics does not distinguish in value between chaos and order, form and formlessness, meaning and nonsense and as such can easily find its way around and between the disruptions, internal and external, psychological and political, of conflict.
Keith Seat
An open letter from 138 leading Muslims to worldwide Christian leaders calls for cooperation to create peace and understanding, by emphasizing the common foundation between Muslims and Christians (and Jews) based on key shared commandments of love of one God and love of neighbor. The 29-page letter dated October 13 seeks more than “polite ecumenical dialogue” between religious leaders, because the future and perhaps survival of the world is at stake, and concludes by urging peace and harmony, with mutual respect and goodwill. The Islamic unity shown in the letter is notable, with influential signatories from the Sunni, Shi’a, Salafi and Sufi traditions. While the letter appears to present opportunities for dialogue and interaction, no specific response or next steps are proposed.
Common Ground News Service; Open Letter from Muslim Religious Leaders (October 13, 2007)
Victoria Pynchon The negotiator's equivalent of "don't make a federal case out of it" is "what do you think you're doing, brokering a negotiated peace in the Middle East?"
Well (thanks -- again! -- to Geoff Sharp) we bring you negotiation tips from a guy who has brokered Middle East peace treaties -- Dennis Ross (Diplomacy: Talking Sense) former Middle East envoy and chief peace negotiator for both the Clinton and Bush senior administrations. (Ross' new book: Statecraft and How to Restore America's Standing in the World, right) Here, Ross gives us a twelve step list for effective negotiations (please go to the article itself for the detail; it's well worth the read): - Know what you want, know what you can live with.
- Know everything there is to know about the decision maker(s) on the other side.
- Build a relationship of trust with the key decision maker.
- Keep in mind the other side's need for an explanation.
- To gain the hardest concessions, prove you understand what is important to the other side.
- Tough Love is also required.
- Employ the good-cop, bad-cop approach carefully.
- Understand the value and limitations of deadlines.
- Take only calculated risks.
- Never lie, never bluff
- Don't paper over differences.
- Summarize agreements at the end of every meeting.
ADR and the Talmud
Jay H Isenberg The article is a description and celebration of the parallels between the ADR process and that of Talmudic study. Both are characterized by intense investigation and interpretation of the material while immersed in the duties of study and/or facilitation and evaluation. The author goes on to challenge the "grip of the Orthodoxy" as the gatekeepers to entry into these processes and advocates for a more inclusive and expansive approach to conflict prevention and resolution in the construction industry.
U.S. Ninth Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace stated recently in Pakistan that he believes use of mediation is consistent with the requirements of the Koran. Discussing difficulties facing judiciaries around the world, Judge Wallace emphasized mediation and its success in most of the 50-60 countries in which he has worked. Judge Wallace noted the potential for mediation in Pakistan and praised Pakistan’s Supreme Court Justice Jillani for his promotion of alternative dispute resolution.
Pakistan Link (August 14, 2006)
Does Israel Need A National Program of Healing and Reconciliation?
Jonathan W. Reitman The recent disengagement from Gaza was traumatic for Israeli society. It deepend divisions in a society already deeply polarized. It served to escalate the harshness of public discourse in a country already riven by derisive rhetoric. This article examines those divisions and proposes a National Program of Healing and Reconciliation for Israel, which just might have a dramatic impact on Palestinian society as well.
The Middle East: Separating The People From The Problem
Meg Anderson To deal with “people problems” generally, Fisher and Ury council acknowledging the emotions, allowing people to let off steam, and not reacting to emotional outbursts. But what happens when the emotions are so vitriolic that the outbursts are literally murderous? What happens when a pattern of violence is established that is so dire, and so long standing, that factions form on both sides who will kill their own leadership before they will permit any negotiation with their despised enemy to succeed? How is conflict transformation possible in this climate of perpetual animosity and outright warfare?
The Iraq War and Mediation?
John Willis In the recent letter, a citizen has raised several important points regarding the war in Iraq. Noting that the U.S. essentially is fighting the war alone, without allies, this person suggested that “mediation is the only channel which will allow the U.S. to gain support with former allies and end this daily slaughter of human life.” Let’s follow the order of the elements mentioned in turn: mediation, support of former allies, and ending the war.
Mediating Evil, War, and Terrorism: The Politics of Conflict
Kenneth Cloke We require improved understanding, not only of the conflict in politics, but the politics in conflict. As our world shrinks and our problems can no longer be solved except internationally, we need ways of revealing, even in seemingly ordinary, interpersonal conflicts, the larger issues that connect us across boundaries, and methods for resolving political conflicts that are sweeping, strategic, interest-based, and transformational. A clear, unambiguous reason for doing so occurred on September 11, 2001.
A Firsthand View of the Middle East: Lessons Of Mediation Provide Insight
Jeffrey I. Abrams At the end of last year, I visited Kuwait, Israel, the West Bank,
and Jordan as part of a 50-person U.S. delegation to the Middle
East led by former Ambassador Dennis Ross. Over a period
of 10 days, our delegation met with a king, three prime ministers, and
a host of high-ranking government and military officials to discuss the
major topics of the day, including Israeli-Palestinian relations. As we met with leaders
such as King Abdullah of Jordan, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel,
and Prime Minister Abu Ala of the Palestinian Authority, I was struck
by how much my experience as a professional mediator affected my
perspective about the seemingly irresolvable dispute between Israelis
and Palestinians.
Framing GABI as GRIT in the Middle East
Joshua N. Weiss In the past few months much has transpired in the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians. Most of it has continued to be destructive, frustrating, and down right depressing for all involved. So, what does it all mean? Without being coy, it depends on where you sit and why you sit there...in short, it depends on framing.
Bridging the Gap: Proposals and Precedents for Third Party Involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Tom Smith This briefing paper will discuss past examples of
dispute resolution mechanisms in the Middle East, demonstrating how
accumulated experiences in the region already provide
useful tools for the international community in helping
resolve this conflict. Five different roles for a third party in
situations of conflict will be examined and examples of
their application in the region will be provided. The
relevance of these roles for use in the present context will
then be discussed, and the political obstacles to their
implementation considered.
A Middle East Union: A Two-Stage Solution To The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Jeff Halper Since the 1980s the Palestinian leadership, most Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, the Israeli peace movement and a growing majority of Israelis have advocated a two-state solution to their interminable conflict. There exists yet another option, far less elegant, much more difficult to present in a sound-byte. That is an evolutionary “two-stage” conception in which two states, Palestine and Israel, eventually join in a bi-national federation that in time will include Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and ultimately Egypt and other countries of the Middle East – a Middle East Union. A win-win approach, it rests on the balance between national sovereignty and the freedom to live and work regionally that underpins the European Union.
Reframing Solutions To Middle East Conflicts
Paul Wahrhaftig “Ho hum, here we go again,” I was thinking as I sat at a dining-room table with a group of Palestinians and Israelis discussing the prospects for peace in their respective homelands. The animated discussion centered on trying to persuade each other that a single state solution is better or more attainable than a two state solution, or visa versa. One participant began to poll the group on this question. “Would a Palestinian State along side of Israel be attainable or desirable? Would a single secular state encompassing both populations be better?”
Is Negotiation Still the Solution in the Middle East?
Manie Spoelstra After the death of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, a prominent Hamas leader, on March 22nd, (aged about 66) at the hand of the Israel military and the resultant further escalation of violence, one can rightfully pose the question: “Does negotiation still provide any solution in this crisis”?
Incrementaled to Death: Peacemaking in the Middle East
Joshua N. Weiss This article challenges the recurrent approach to peacemaking in the Middle East conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians. It suggests that the slow incremental approach, while designed to build trust between the parties, does not do that due to spoilers and has been tried and failed. This will happen again because neither population sees any progress on the core of the conflict. An alternative, more radical approach, employed in other conflicts is suggested to break this ineffective approach in this specific conflict.
Interview with Bill Lincoln
Ana Schofield Bill is a source of inspiration for many and is undoubtedly one of the ‘unsung heroes’ of this profession. Bill, at 62, has spent much of his life dealing with the complexities of conflict. His courage to go into dangerous situations is found where peace and justice are absent. Bill places his words and actions where his heart lies and risks his life for his beliefs. While he may be afraid, he goes ‘on anyway’. How many people today are willing to face fear with the courage of a warrior armed with words instead of weapons?
Where Is The Wisdom?
Stewart Levine A chilling wind is blowing. As I write it is sending shivers of fear through my body. These shivers make me profoundly aware of the terror our founding fathers had suffered, and why they held freedom of expression as bedrock for the democratic union they conceived.
Why Has Negotiation Gotten a Bad Name?
Joshua N. Weiss You can't negotiate with terrorists! You can't negotiate with rogue states
like Iraq and North Korea that would be rewarding their threatening and
bad behavior! You wouldn't negotiate with Hitler would you look what
happened to Chamberlain!
Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences
US Senator Robert Byrd We stand passively mute in the United States Senate, paralyzed by our own
uncertainty, seemingly stunned by the sheer turmoil of events. Only on the
editorial pages of our newspapers is there much substantive discussion of
the prudence or imprudence of engaging in this particular war. Senate Floor Speech delivered on Wednesday, February 12, 2003.
A Wish For The Future
John Paul Lederach I have a wish for a gift given from our generation to our great grandchildren, from the adults of this decade to the children of the end of this Century: Let this be the decade remembered as the time when the beginning of the end of human warfare happened.
Conflict Transformation in an Age of Terrorism
Ronald S. Kraybill America has invested lavishly and narrowly in hammers. As a consequence, the mightiest nation in history responds simplistically to a problem of vast complexity. Rather than examine the full extent of the evil mess created by decades of destructive interaction between ourselves and others, we choose responses that under-estimate the gravity of our situation. We satisfy our need to act, but our children will bear the cost, for the problems will grow far worse on the long-term.
November 2002
By Ivan Gale
West Marin women bared their bodies on Tuesday in Point Reyes Station for a photo protesting America's plans for armed conflict with Iraq.
Participants using solely their bodies spelled out 'PEACE" as a light rain fell.
Portrait photographer and Light correspondent Art Rogers captured the moment from high atop a ladder using a homemade tripod standing about 15-feet above Love Field near the Green Bridge.
Participant Cynthia Clarkson of Point Reyes Station told The Light she hoped the photo will have a strong impact in America and abroad.
"I'm hoping it gets distributed so that the message gets across that women in America want peace," said Clarkson. "I want to do everything I can to stop the war that's impending."
Marshall resident Donna Sheehan, who organized the group called "Unreasonable Women" for the photo, said she's been pondering for four years a way women can "be heard on a very deep level."
Decades since last protest
Other participants said it had been decades, in many cases since the 1960s, since they've been in a protest.
Sheehan said the group first got the idea from a similar protest in Nigeria this past year. Sheehan said women fighting corporate exploitation stood nude in a vigil that lasted several days outside of Nigeria's parliament.
"[The Nigerian women] shamed the men and won their cause," she said.
As the women circled together and readied for their cause Sheehan lauded the group for showing their courage. "Would you be willing to stand [naked] in front of the White House?" Sheehan said amidst cheers from the participants.
Making peace
"America is destroying the world in its pursuit of resources," said Melinda Leithold. "It's thoughtless and feelingless."
As the women anxiously eyed gathering rainclouds, photographer Rogers moved them into position, posing each from his perch atop his ladder.
Afterward, organizer Sheehan said the day had proved to be a beautiful and powerful experience for all involved. "I think it's going to a make a mark in the political and art world," she said.
A Call to the Conflict Resolution Community
Bridget Moix The need for voices which can articulate, with experience and professional knowledge, the dangers of spiraling cycles of violence, of an "us vs. them" approach to the world, of seeking security for oneself through war against another, has never been greater. More than anything, policymakers in the U.S. and internationally need to be convinced that effective alternatives for dealing with entrenched and spiraling conflict do exist, that face-saving ways out of the corners we find ourselves in can be found, that our own security is linked inextricably to the security of our global neighbors and even our so-called global enemies. The conflict resolution field has the experience, the knowledge, and the compassion that is critically needed in the current political debate. If only it will raise its voice.
The Wall and 'Supply Side Security'
Ronald S. Kraybill It's time to move past "do-we-or-don't we shell Saddam" to the stuff burning holes in our hearts. Let's name what we're really after. Isn't it security, to know that when we say good-bye to our families in the morning we'll live to say hello again over the dinner table at night? To know that our kids get to have grandkids someday?
U.S. Mediator? – A Misnomer in the Middle East Conflict
Patrick Chapman Patrick Chapman analyzes the recent U.S. Diplomacy in the Middle East conflict and assesses why the U.S. government is not a Mediator in the conflict. Chapman also addresses the human issue in the Middle East conflict, encouraging both realists and idealists to be introspective and action oriented.
The Loss of Civic Connectedness
W. Steve Lee An increasing number of people are expressing concern over the loss of civic connectedness in America. Voting, volunteerism, and participation in professional and community associations, it seems, are in decline. Experts, such as noted scholar Robert D. Putnam, warn that our stock of social capital - the fabric of our connections with each other - has plummeted, bankrupting our lives and communities.
Occupation, Terrorism Devastate Two Peoples
Nir Pearlson The Weeping will last for generations to come, and what are we to tell our offspring? I was born and raised in Israel, where I served in an elite unit in the Israeli Defense Forces. When my comrades and I were trained to be soldiers, we knew that our army was essential for protecting our homes and families. We also still believed that our army was guided by the principle of "tohar ha'neshek." It translates into English as "purity of arms," and refers to the moral understanding that any weapon must be used solely as a means of defense in preventing the destruction of oneself, one's family and one's nation.
Should We Negotiate with Terrorists?
Cris Currie While it may seem that those of us in the field of conflict resolution have had little to say since September 11, 2001, professional negotiators have not been silent on the subject of terrorism. Roger Fisher addressed this very question in the second edition of Getting To Yes, and in January of 1992, the Negotiation Journal published a special issue called Reflections on the War in the Persian Gulf. The insights found in these publications are just as valid in the aftermath of the World Trade Center attack as they were for the terrorism of the 1980s and early 90s.
Statement Against Employment Discrimination in the Aftermath of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks
EEOC, Department of Labor and the Department of Justice, U.S. We continue to receive reports of incidents of
harassment, discrimination, and violence in the workplace against
individuals who are, or are perceived to be, Arab, Muslim, Middle
Eastern, South Asian, or Sikh. As leaders within the principal federal agencies responsible for
enforcing the laws against discrimination in employment, we are
issuing this joint statement to reaffirm the federal government's
commitment to the civil rights of all working people in our fight
against terrorism.
Two Geopolitical Worldviews Compete for the Steering Wheel
Thomas Jordan The discussions in the media about the terror attacks in the USA make painfully clear that the commentators and decision-makers react to the events in such different ways that meaningful communication is very difficult. However, the outcomes of these discussions are critically important to us all, because the reactions of the West to terrorism will have far-reaching consequences for the course of events in the global society in the coming years.
Quo Vadis? Reframing Terror from the Perspective of Conflict Resolution
John Paul Lederach The events on September 11, 2001 that overtook our daily lives and reoriented our national and global priorities pose significant challenges for our newly emerging century. They leave us with the question -- Quo vadis -- where are we headed? Where we are going and how we get there depends a great deal on how we define the nature of our journey, its challenges, and ultimately its proposed destination. We might best understand our destination as a horizon, visible as a guidepost but never removing the need for continued journey.
How Should We Respond To Terrorism?
Michael McCabe Some years ago I wrote a paper, entitled “I used to know all the answers. Now, I know some of the questions.” The question that introduces this reflection is one that I never expected to ask. But it must be asked if we are to learn anything from the events of September 11th.
Understanding the Incomprehensible: Identity, Security and Terrorism
Camilo Azcarate The field that studies conflict as a social phenomenon is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, during the last 50 years the work of social scientist has greatly advanced our understanding of the problem. Today, we have a better understanding of the creation and development of such conflicts and we have developed social tools and methods necessary to analyze and address them. The purpose of this paper is to review some of them and to apply this knowledge to the events of September 11.
Some Questions to Consider in Responding to Terrorism
Kenneth Cloke "How easy it is to kill someone you don’t have to mourn because you never dared to imagine him alive." This is the essence of terrorism, but it is also the essence of war. Indeed, isn’t terrorism simply a form of warfare directed at civilians? Isn’t every war, regardless of its’ declared military aims, an assault on innocent civilians?
Black and Red, White & Blue: What Choices Do We Have to the Attacks on America?
Paula Young Forgive me if I join the call for a peaceful dialogue and justice through international criminal law. As a mediator and trial attorney, I have faith in the integrity and success of both processes. Forgive me if I chose to wear black in respect for the missing and dead, but chose not to wear a flag in support of a call to war. Forgive me if I ask for the courage to look for a skillful resolution that does not involve violence.
The Script For September 11-The Real Movie
Robert Benjamin On that Tuesday morning, I woke up to NPR and heard the words, ....plane....World Trade Center....Pentagon....crash... terrorists..., and like most people, could not quite comprehend what was happening nor the catastrophic enormity of the event. It felt like I came in late to a movie— a bad movie.
Click here for MORE ARTICLES
Copyright 1996-2008 © Resourceful Internet Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Middle East News
9/05: Negotiations: Egyptian revelations read
9/03: Jihad backs Egypt's mediation efforts on inter-Palestinian dialogue read
8/27: Finding an end to marriage in both civil and sharia law read
8/27: Jihad backs Egypt's mediation efforts on inter-Palestinian dialogue read
8/22: Ahmadinejad backs Qatar on Palestinian mediation read
8/05: Inter-Palestinian clashes overshadow Egypt's mediation efforts on Palestinian issue read
7/29: Israel-Syria peace talks to resume under Turkish mediation read
7/28: US and Iran: A One-Sided Negotiation read
7/28: Inside Iran's complex leadership read
7/23: Middle East faces a new era in mediation as the US stands back read
read all
Worth
Considering
Unless justice be done to others it will not be done to us.
|
|